Course record ARCH

ARCH 1102

Architectural Representation II

Texas Tech University

Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2019–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 8 of 8

Milad Fereshtehnezhad 16 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.56
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.52
Nate Imai 18 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.65
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.70
Galo Canizares 12 median item responses 4.34Eval / 5
Overall4.34 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.32
Course assignments facilitated learning4.47
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Isabel Manahl 61 median item responses 4.26Eval / 5
Overall4.26 / 5

61 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.18
Course assignments facilitated learning4.39
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Nero He 56 median item responses 2.77Eval / 5
Overall2.77 / 5

56 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.57
Course assignments facilitated learning2.93
Opportunities to be successful in course2.82
Sadaf Alikhani 66 median item responses 3.82Eval / 5
Overall3.82 / 5

66 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.76
Course assignments facilitated learning3.81
Opportunities to be successful in course4.03
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.81
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.78
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.73
Terah Maher 13 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

13 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.36
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.52
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Zachary S. Casey 78 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

78 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.13
Course assignments facilitated learning4.13
Opportunities to be successful in course4.36
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.31
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.18
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.26
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.15
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Casey, Zachary

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.