Course record / ANSC
ANSC 3307
Feeds and Feeding
Texas Tech University
1 section20 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data
This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Average GPA
Jhones Sarturi
1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample
ABC
3.15GPA
Published grade shares · Limited sample
Overall4.23 / 5
51 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.20
Opportunities to be successful in course3.96
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.41
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.39
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.33
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.34
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.31
Lauren Ovinge
13 median item responses
3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
13 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.15
Opportunities to be successful in course3.77
Pedro Ricardo Ballavenuto Campanili
8 median item responses
3.63Eval / 5
Overall3.63 / 5
8 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.63
Opportunities to be successful in course3.63
Darren Henry
33 median item responses
3.96Eval / 5
Overall3.96 / 5
33 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.95
Opportunities to be successful in course3.38
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.21
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.17
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.24
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.17
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Whitney L. Crossland
26 median item responses
4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5
26 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.18
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.19
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.04
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.96
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.88
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.71
Janghan Choi
36 median item responses
3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
36 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning3.92
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.92
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.78
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.42
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.67
Bradley Johnson
62 median item responses
4.42Eval / 5
Overall4.42 / 5
62 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.61
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.27
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.56
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.33
Sara Trojan
48 median item responses
4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5
48 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.23
Opportunities to be successful in course4.14
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.46
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.45
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.30
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.49
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.21
Elizabeth Domby
19 median item responses
4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
19 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.45
Opportunities to be successful in course4.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.62
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.55
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.64
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.07
Tyler Harris
21 median item responses
4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5
21 median item responses
Scale 1–5
Course assignments facilitated learning4.05
Opportunities to be successful in course4.15
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.14
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.95
Show all 20 professors ↓
University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.
Spring 2026 · Section S01
Sarturi, Jhones · Instructor record
Spring 2025 · Section S01
Sarturi, Jhones · Instructor record
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.