Course record ANSC

ANSC 3204

Advanced Livestock, Horse, and Meat Judging

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Markus Miller 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Clay T Elliott 7 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.71
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.14
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.71
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.57
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.71
Jane Bagley 4 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.75
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Loni Lucherk 14 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.93
Ryan Rathmann 3 median item responses 4.21Eval / 5
Overall4.21 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.57
Course assignments facilitated learning4.57
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Blake Foraker 3 median item responses 3.75Eval / 5
Overall3.75 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.50
Course assignments facilitated learning2.50
Opportunities to be successful in course2.50
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Samuel Jackson 22 median item responses 4.33Eval / 5
Overall4.33 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.14
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.38
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.32
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.37
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.44
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.29
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.