Course record ANSC

ANSC 2202

Principles of Anatomy of Domestic Animals

Texas Tech University

2 sections14 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2006–2026
Flunk Score22/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 14

Gretchen Neary 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.41GPA
58.0% A
28.0% B
11.0% C
2.0% D
1.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Tiffanie Brooks 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.37GPA
17.6% A
30.6% B
30.6% C
11.8% D
9.4% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

John Mcglone 20 median item responses 2.56Eval / 5
Overall2.56 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.87
Course assignments facilitated learning2.32
Opportunities to be successful in course2.29
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills2.75
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.06
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course2.79
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.11
J Brooks 38 median item responses 4.25Eval / 5
Overall4.25 / 5

38 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.29
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.40
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.27
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.22
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.11
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.30
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.03
Chrissy Barron 46 median item responses 3.92Eval / 5
Overall3.92 / 5

46 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.15
Course assignments facilitated learning3.70
Opportunities to be successful in course3.82
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.10
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.08
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.68
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.74
Mhairi Sutherland 50 median item responses 3.84Eval / 5
Overall3.84 / 5

50 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.67
Course assignments facilitated learning3.79
Opportunities to be successful in course3.68
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.09
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.80
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.13
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives3.60
Brittany Davis 36 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.42
Course assignments facilitated learning4.54
Opportunities to be successful in course4.48
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.60
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.51
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.53
Tyler Harris 36 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

36 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.49
Course assignments facilitated learning4.53
Opportunities to be successful in course4.47
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.59
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.55
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.54
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Jessica Starkey 12 median item responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.09
Course assignments facilitated learning4.41
Opportunities to be successful in course4.22
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.29
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.38
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.36
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Jennifer Nicole Martin 96 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

96 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.60
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.72
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.73
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.48
Show all 14 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 5

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Fall 2026 · Section not specified

Gauthier, Hannah

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Gauthier, Hannah

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2025 · Section not specified

Gauthier, Hannah

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
2 more syllabi

Spring 2025 · Section not specified

Gauthier, Hannah

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09

Fall 2024 · Section not specified

Gauthier, Hannah

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.