Course record AGLS

AGLS 1300

Introduction to Agricultural Leadership Development

Texas Tech University

1 section7 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2013–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 7 of 7

Amy Boren 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.01GPA
38.9% A
37.9% B
13.7% C
3.2% D
6.3% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Michel Brashears 37 median item responses 2.87Eval / 5
Overall2.87 / 5

37 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.00
Course assignments facilitated learning2.56
Opportunities to be successful in course2.54
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills3.16
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.21
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content2.56
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course3.42
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.50
Cheryl Williams 33 median item responses 2.92Eval / 5
Overall2.92 / 5

33 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized2.58
Course assignments facilitated learning3.27
Opportunities to be successful in course2.91
Amy E. Boren Alpizar 15 median item responses 4.05Eval / 5
Overall4.05 / 5

15 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.81
Course assignments facilitated learning3.91
Opportunities to be successful in course3.89
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.11
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.10
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.22
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.18
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.18
Jason J. Headrick 26 median item responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.61
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.67
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.76
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.74
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
Pin Hsueh Lee 6 median item responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.67
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.67
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.67
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Sarahi De Los Angeles Morales Vanegas 3 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

3 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.33
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.67
Course documents

Syllabi 3

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Summer II 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.