Course record AERS

AERS 2104

Team and Leadership Fundamentals II

Texas Tech University

1 section18 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2002–2026
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 10 of 18

James Marlow 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.73GPA
76.9% A
18.7% B
4.4% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Raymond Knox 12 median item responses 4.95Eval / 5
Overall4.95 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.88
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course4.92
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.96
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.92
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.96
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Dennis Wayne Knight 16 median item responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5

16 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.89
Course assignments facilitated learning4.74
Opportunities to be successful in course4.77
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.89
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.83
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.79
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.86
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.74
Brian 17202aers020333 Hippel 9 median item responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5

9 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.72
Course assignments facilitated learning3.99
Opportunities to be successful in course4.10
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.72
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.40
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.72
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.17
David Lewis 6 median item responses 4.98Eval / 5
Overall4.98 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.93
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.93
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Darin L Rose 8 median item responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.86
Course assignments facilitated learning4.73
Opportunities to be successful in course4.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.84
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.84
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.86
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.87
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.84
April Ducote 7 median item responses 4.44Eval / 5
Overall4.44 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.59
Course assignments facilitated learning4.34
Opportunities to be successful in course4.23
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.59
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.32
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.37
Alexander Hawthorne 8 median item responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5

8 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.46
Opportunities to be successful in course4.46
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.80
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.88
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.38
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.94
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.30
David Simpson 7 median item responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5

7 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.91
Course assignments facilitated learning4.86
Opportunities to be successful in course4.85
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.95
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.95
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.69
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.95
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.69
Gary Glover 11 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

11 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Show all 18 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 1

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Spring 2026 · Section not specified

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.