Course record ADM

ADM 4350

Apparel Portfolio Development

Texas Tech University

1 section8 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2025
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison data

This course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.

Professors 8 of 8

Rachel Anderson 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.18GPA
36.0% A
46.0% B
18.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Su Shin 4 median item responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5

4 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.25
Course assignments facilitated learning4.25
Opportunities to be successful in course4.25
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.50
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.25
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.75
Jovita Lektzian 6 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Mahendran Balasubramanian 2 median item responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5

2 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized5.00
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Lauren Rougeaux-Burnes 5 median item responses 4.73Eval / 5
Overall4.73 / 5

5 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.80
Course assignments facilitated learning4.80
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Damon R Richards 18 median item responses 4.97Eval / 5
Overall4.97 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.78
Course assignments facilitated learning5.00
Opportunities to be successful in course5.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills5.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content5.00
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content5.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course5.00
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives5.00
Maria Teresa Leos 14 median item responses 3.45Eval / 5
Overall3.45 / 5

14 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.79
Course assignments facilitated learning2.79
Opportunities to be successful in course2.93
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.07
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content3.86
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content3.21
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.07
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives2.86
Flor Leyva 18 median item responses 4.16Eval / 5
Overall4.16 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning3.94
Opportunities to be successful in course3.67
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.50
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.41
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.61
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Course documents

Syllabi 2

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.