Course record ACCT

ACCT 4301

Principles of Auditing

Texas Tech University

3 sections19 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2001–2026
Flunk Score32/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 19

Andrea Romi 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.20GPA
38.5% A
44.8% B
13.5% C
3.1% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Blair Marquardt 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 3.16GPA
42.0% A
37.0% B
16.0% C
5.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Yi Jing Wu 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.83GPA
22.2% A
49.5% B
21.2% C
4.0% D
3.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Linda Marie Nichols 35 median item responses 4.18Eval / 5
Overall4.18 / 5

35 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.02
Course assignments facilitated learning3.97
Opportunities to be successful in course3.79
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.47
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.42
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.19
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.46
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.12
Matthew Hart 26 median item responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5

26 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.70
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.63
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.74
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.77
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.59
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.75
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.51
Steven Richard Buchheit 20 median item responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

20 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.64
Course assignments facilitated learning4.31
Opportunities to be successful in course4.39
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.63
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.47
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.81
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.22
William Buslepp 18 median item responses 4.50Eval / 5
Overall4.50 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.39
Course assignments facilitated learning4.65
Opportunities to be successful in course4.45
Danielle Gant 25 median item responses 4.56Eval / 5
Overall4.56 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.66
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.60
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.68
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.44
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.32
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.68
Suzanne Shoukfeh 30 median item responses 3.89Eval / 5
Overall3.89 / 5

30 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.63
Course assignments facilitated learning4.21
Opportunities to be successful in course3.84
Jeremy Richardson 25 median item responses 4.68Eval / 5
Overall4.68 / 5

25 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.62
Course assignments facilitated learning4.76
Opportunities to be successful in course4.67
Show all 19 professors
Course documents

Syllabi 7

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

4 more syllabi

Spring 2026 · Section 001

Instructor not extracted

Read syllabus Checked 2026-09-09
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.