Course record AAEC

AAEC 3315

Agricultural Price Theory

Texas Tech University

2 sections10 professors
Grades: Dates unavailableEvaluations: 2009–2026
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 10

Ryan Williams 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.52GPA
15.8% A
40.0% B
28.4% C
11.6% D
4.2% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Shaikh Rahman 1 sections · 1 term · Limited sample 2.00GPA
8.0% A
15.0% B
46.0% C
31.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · Limited sample

Jamie L. Pavlik 19 median item responses 4.37Eval / 5
Overall4.37 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.34
Course assignments facilitated learning4.56
Opportunities to be successful in course4.20
Sukant Misra 21 median item responses 4.29Eval / 5
Overall4.29 / 5

21 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.24
Course assignments facilitated learning4.36
Opportunities to be successful in course4.34
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.24
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.36
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.28
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.23
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.23
Michael Hudson 24 median item responses 4.63Eval / 5
Overall4.63 / 5

24 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.67
Course assignments facilitated learning4.63
Opportunities to be successful in course4.58
Syed Badruddoza 12 median item responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5

12 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.58
Course assignments facilitated learning4.62
Opportunities to be successful in course4.57
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.49
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.58
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.58
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.58
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.58
Aaron G Benson 6 median item responses 4.19Eval / 5
Overall4.19 / 5

6 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.17
Course assignments facilitated learning4.17
Opportunities to be successful in course4.00
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.00
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.67
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.00
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.50
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.00
Justin Weinheimer 22 median item responses 4.75Eval / 5
Overall4.75 / 5

22 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.77
Course assignments facilitated learning4.77
Opportunities to be successful in course4.71
Overall course helped learn required concepts/ skills4.64
Instructor helped to understand relevance of course content4.73
Instructors teaching methods helped to learn course content4.81
Instructor presented material in way that helped engage in course4.77
Instructor tailored instructions/ lessons to variety of perspectives4.76
Sunghun Lim 19 median item responses 4.54Eval / 5
Overall4.54 / 5

19 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized4.53
Course assignments facilitated learning4.68
Opportunities to be successful in course4.42
Jamie Bologna 18 median item responses 4.02Eval / 5
Overall4.02 / 5

18 median item responses

Scale 1–5
Course was organized3.94
Course assignments facilitated learning4.33
Opportunities to be successful in course3.78
Course documents

Syllabi 11

University library ↗

University-published syllabi. Dates apply to these documents, independently of the grade data range.

8 more syllabi
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.