Course record SCMT

SCMT 345

Business Process Design

Texas A & M University-College Station

1,008 grades31 sections5 professors
Grades: 2014–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score26/100
Below average

Professors 5 of 5

Y Li 107 grades · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.32GPA
43.9% A
44.9% B
10.3% C
0.9% D
0.0% F

107 letter grades · 3 sections · 2015–2016

Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A +8.0
B −8.4
C +1.1
D −0.6
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.8% withdrew · 2 of 109 enrolled.

R Johnson 390 grades · 7 terms · 2014–2018 3.31GPA
36.9% A
56.9% B
6.2% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

390 letter grades · 12 sections · 2014–2018

Compare with the course
Johnson vs. the course average
A +1.0
B +3.6
C −3.1
D −1.5
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Spring 2018

0.3% withdrew · 1 of 391 enrolled.

S Rangan 253 grades · 3 terms · 2014–2019 3.23GPA
36.0% A
53.0% B
9.1% C
2.0% D
0.0% F

253 letter grades · 6 sections · 2014–2019

Compare with the course
Rangan vs. the course average
A +0.1
B −0.3
C −0.1
D +0.5
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

1.2% withdrew · 3 of 256 enrolled.

M Ketzenberg 172 grades · 3 terms · 2014–2017 3.14GPA
31.4% A
55.2% B
9.9% C
2.9% D
0.6% F

172 letter grades · 6 sections · 2014–2017

Compare with the course
Ketzenberg vs. the course average
A −4.5
B +2.0
C +0.7
D +1.4
F +0.5

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 172 enrolled.

A Angelus 86 grades · 2 terms · 2018–2019 3.00GPA
30.2% A
44.2% B
20.9% C
4.7% D
0.0% F

86 letter grades · 4 sections · 2018–2019

Compare with the course
Angelus vs. the course average
A −5.7
B −9.1
C +11.7
D +3.2
F −0.1

Difference in percentage points.

6.5% withdrew · 6 of 92 enrolled.

Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.