Course record MATH

MATH 409

Analysis on the Real Line

Texas A & M University-College Station

872 grades47 sections20 professors
Grades: 2014–2019

Latest dated data is over 4 years old.

Flunk Score10/100
Needs work

Professors 10 of 20

D Larson 119 grades · 7 terms · 2014–2019 3.40GPA
58.8% A
24.4% B
16.0% C
0.0% D
0.8% F

119 letter grades · 9 sections · 2014–2019

Compare with the course
Larson vs. the course average
A +23.3
B −8.0
C −5.8
D −6.3
F −3.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Fall 2019

8.5% withdrew · 11 of 130 enrolled.

G Battle 69 grades · 2 terms · 2016–2019 3.35GPA
53.6% A
31.9% B
10.1% C
4.3% D
0.0% F

69 letter grades · 2 sections · 2016–2019

Compare with the course
Battle vs. the course average
A +18.1
B −0.5
C −11.6
D −2.0
F −4.0

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 2 of 71 enrolled.

H Boas 108 grades · 4 terms · 2015–2018 3.12GPA
34.3% A
46.3% B
17.6% C
0.9% D
0.9% F

108 letter grades · 5 sections · 2015–2018

Compare with the course
Boas vs. the course average
A −1.3
B +14.0
C −4.2
D −5.4
F −3.1

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Spring 2018

3.6% withdrew · 4 of 112 enrolled.

F Narcowich 32 grades · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.03GPA
34.4% A
40.6% B
21.9% C
0.0% D
3.1% F

32 letter grades · 2 sections · 2014–2015

Compare with the course
Narcowich vs. the course average
A −1.2
B +8.3
C +0.1
D −6.3
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 32 enrolled.

P Eviatar 55 grades · 1 term · 2019 3.00GPA
43.6% A
29.1% B
18.2% C
1.8% D
7.3% F

55 letter grades · 2 sections · 2019

Compare with the course
Eviatar vs. the course average
A +8.1
B −3.2
C −3.6
D −4.5
F +3.3

Difference in percentage points.

5.2% withdrew · 3 of 58 enrolled.

D Kerr 69 grades · 2 terms · 2014–2015 2.93GPA
33.3% A
33.3% B
29.0% C
1.4% D
2.9% F

69 letter grades · 3 sections · 2014–2015

Compare with the course
Kerr vs. the course average
A −2.2
B +1.0
C +7.2
D −4.9
F −1.1

Difference in percentage points.

8.0% withdrew · 6 of 75 enrolled.

F Baudier 50 grades · 4 terms · 2016–2019 2.80GPA
36.0% A
26.0% B
22.0% C
14.0% D
2.0% F

50 letter grades · 4 sections · 2016–2019

Compare with the course
Baudier vs. the course average
A +0.4
B −6.3
C +0.2
D +7.7
F −2.0

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2016Summer 2019

0.0% withdrew · 0 of 50 enrolled.

Z Xie 76 grades · 3 terms · 2017–2019 2.76GPA
18.4% A
48.7% B
25.0% C
6.6% D
1.3% F

76 letter grades · 3 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Xie vs. the course average
A −17.1
B +16.3
C +3.2
D +0.3
F −2.7

Difference in percentage points.

8.4% withdrew · 7 of 83 enrolled.

R Tucker-Drob 32 grades · 1 term · 2017 2.69GPA
12.5% A
56.3% B
21.9% C
6.3% D
3.1% F

32 letter grades · 1 section · 2017

Compare with the course
Tucker-Drob vs. the course average
A −23.1
B +23.9
C +0.1
D −0.1
F −0.9

Difference in percentage points.

3.0% withdrew · 1 of 33 enrolled.

T Schlumprecht 35 grades · 1 term · 2016 2.63GPA
20.0% A
34.3% B
37.1% C
5.7% D
2.9% F

35 letter grades · 1 section · 2016

Compare with the course
Schlumprecht vs. the course average
A −15.6
B +1.9
C +15.4
D −0.6
F −1.2

Difference in percentage points.

2.8% withdrew · 1 of 36 enrolled.

Show all 20 professors
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.