Course record RUSS
RUSS 2001
Intermediate Russian I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
36 sections8 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2013–2023
Flunk Score64/100
Strong
Matthew Mangold 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Mangold vs. the course average
A
+9.5
B
−8.2
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.93
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.67
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Valeriya Chekalina 5 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Chekalina vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−2.7
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Fall 2025
Overall4.94 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Natalia Myshkin 7 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2016 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Myshkin vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
−4.2
C
+0.4
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2016
Overall4.97 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Natasha Anthony 13 sections · 10 terms · 2010–2018 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2010–2018
Compare with the course
Anthony vs. the course average
A
+2.7
B
−1.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2018
Overall4.95 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Tatiana Kozhanova 3 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2020 3.75GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Kozhanova vs. the course average
A
+4.8
B
−8.6
C
−0.9
D
same
F
+4.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Stuart Goldberg 5 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2023 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2013–2023
Compare with the course
Goldberg vs. the course average
A
−28.0
B
+24.3
C
+4.2
D
same
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2023
Overall4.74 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.59
Course effectiveness4.59
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.56
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.51
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Mila Nazyrova 5 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Dina Khapaeva 7 reported responses 4.61Eval / 5
Overall4.61 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.