Course record PHIL
PHIL 3109
Engineering Ethics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
85 sections7 professors
Grades: 2012–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score21/100
Below average
Alzbeta Hajkova 4 sections · 4 terms · 2023–2024 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Hajkova vs. the course average
A
+23.7
B
−16.3
C
−5.9
D
−1.6
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Summer 2024
Overall4.56 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.51
Course effectiveness4.44
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness4.44
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Robert Kirkman 21 sections · 21 terms · 2013–2025 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 21 sections · 2013–2025
Compare with the course
Kirkman vs. the course average
A
+14.1
B
−8.2
C
−3.7
D
−1.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2013Summer 2025
Overall4.49 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.93
Instructor clarity4.31
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.69
Instructor communication4.35
Instructor effectiveness4.54
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest4.09
Juan Rogers 4 sections · 4 terms · 2012–2018 3.49GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2018
Compare with the course
Rogers vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
+22.0
C
−7.1
D
−1.6
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2012Spring 2018
Overall4.82 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.87
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Robert Rosenberger 52 sections · 17 terms · 2012–2025 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 52 sections · 2012–2025
Compare with the course
Rosenberger vs. the course average
A
−5.2
B
+1.7
C
+2.2
D
+0.8
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2025
Overall4.70 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.78
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.26
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.84
Assignment measured knowledge4.41
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Jason Borenstein 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2018 3.19GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2018
Compare with the course
Borenstein vs. the course average
A
−24.6
B
+17.6
C
+8.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.11 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Michael Hoffmann 1 sections · 1 term · 2012 · Limited sample 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2012 · Limited sample
Katherine Fu 16 reported responses 3.94Eval / 5
Overall3.94 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.