Course record NEUR
NEUR 2001
Principles in Neuroscience
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
18 sections9 professors
Grades: 2018–2025Evaluations: 2018–2024
Flunk Score19/100
Needs work
Mary Holder 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2025 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Holder vs. the course average
A
+17.6
B
−8.7
C
−7.7
D
−1.6
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.62 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.47
Course effectiveness3.86
Instructor enthusiasm4.11
Instructor helpfulness3.26
Instructor availability3.86
Instructor communication3.53
Instructor effectiveness3.53
Instructor respectfulness3.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.78
Instructor stimulates interest3.41
Christina Ragan 3 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Ragan vs. the course average
A
+16.3
B
−9.4
C
−5.8
D
−1.6
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.74 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.51
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.16
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Alonzo Whyte 6 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2021 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2019–2021
Compare with the course
Whyte vs. the course average
A
+4.7
B
−5.9
C
+1.5
D
same
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2021
Overall4.66 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.71
Instructor helpfulness4.59
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.19
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Alberto Stolfi 2 sections · 1 term · 2024 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Stolfi vs. the course average
A
−4.9
B
+5.1
C
+1.6
D
−1.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.06 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.59
Instructor clarity3.87
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm3.91
Instructor helpfulness4.01
Instructor availability4.21
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.13
Instructor respectfulness4.39
Assignment measured knowledge3.78
Instructor stimulates interest3.89
Haley Steele 2 sections · 1 term · 2023 3.32GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023
Compare with the course
Steele vs. the course average
A
−12.1
B
+10.3
C
+1.5
D
+0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.28 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.18
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness4.18
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.39
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.33
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
Timothy Cope 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2019 3.06GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Cope vs. the course average
A
−26.7
B
+17.1
C
+6.1
D
+3.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.48
Instructor clarity4.52
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.51
Instructor availability4.59
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.04
Instructor stimulates interest4.62
Qiliang He 62 reported responses 4.40Eval / 5
Overall4.40 / 5
62 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.59
Instructor helpfulness4.36
Instructor availability4.37
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.49
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.36
Matthew Nusnbaum 18 reported responses 4.45Eval / 5
Overall4.45 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication4.36
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge3.74
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Katharine Mccann 45 reported responses 4.87Eval / 5
Overall4.87 / 5
45 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.