Course record MSE

MSE 4420

Capstone Engineering Design II

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

21 sections10 professors
Grades: 2013–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score63/100
Strong

Professors 10 of 10

Mary Realff 10 sections · 10 terms · 2016–2025 3.89GPA
90.2% A
8.7% B
1.1% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2016–2025

Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A +7.4
B −6.6
C −0.8
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2025
Gleb Yushin 3 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2020 3.71GPA
74.7% A
21.6% B
3.7% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2020

Compare with the course
Yushin vs. the course average
A −8.1
B +6.3
C +1.8
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Meisha Shofner 3 sections · 3 terms · 2013–2015 3.67GPA
67.1% A
32.9% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2013–2015

Compare with the course
Shofner vs. the course average
A −15.7
B +17.6
C −1.9
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Blair Brettmann 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.67GPA
73.0% A
21.0% B
6.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Brettmann vs. the course average
A −9.8
B +5.7
C +4.1
D same
F same

Difference in percentage points.

Natalie Stingelin 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
100.0% A
0.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample

Radhakrishnaiah Parachuru 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
92.0% A
8.0% B
0.0% C
0.0% D
0.0% F

Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample

Amanda Gable 16 reported responses 4.27Eval / 5
Overall4.27 / 5

16 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.53
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.17
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Instructor stimulates interest3.63
Lisa Rosenstein 11 reported responses 4.35Eval / 5
Overall4.35 / 5

11 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Antonio Facchetti 12 reported responses 4.91Eval / 5
Overall4.91 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.89
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.81
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Alena Alamgir 12 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5

12 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.79
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.