Course record MSE
MSE 3021
Materials Laboratory I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
35 sections9 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score30/100
Below average
Christopher Muhlstein 4 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.72GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Muhlstein vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−8.6
C
−1.2
D
−1.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.10
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness3.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Radhakrishnaiah Parachuru 20 sections · 7 terms · 2011–2019 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 20 sections · 2011–2019
Compare with the course
Parachuru vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
−2.7
C
−1.6
D
−0.2
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2019
Overall3.26 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.10
Instructor clarity2.83
Course effectiveness2.89
Instructor enthusiasm3.40
Instructor helpfulness3.29
Instructor availability3.39
Instructor communication3.29
Instructor effectiveness3.00
Instructor respectfulness4.01
Assignment measured knowledge3.49
Instructor stimulates interest2.85
Naresh Thadhani 4 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Thadhani vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
+7.0
C
−0.8
D
−1.1
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.85 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.03
Instructor clarity3.65
Course effectiveness3.13
Instructor enthusiasm3.87
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication3.57
Instructor effectiveness3.65
Instructor respectfulness4.10
Assignment measured knowledge3.33
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
Himani Sharma 7 sections · 7 terms · 2020–2025 3.33GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Sharma vs. the course average
A
−16.1
B
+9.0
C
+5.9
D
+1.9
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Spring 2025
Overall4.31 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.02
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness3.79
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.29
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge3.61
Instructor stimulates interest4.16
Amanda Gable 9 reported responses 3.95Eval / 5
Overall3.95 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.08
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.02
Instructor communication4.19
Instructor effectiveness4.01
Instructor respectfulness4.18
Instructor stimulates interest3.06
Eric Vogel 10 reported responses 4.89Eval / 5
Overall4.89 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Mark Losego 10 reported responses 4.83Eval / 5
Overall4.83 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Alena Alamgir 16 reported responses 3.73Eval / 5
Overall3.73 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.51
Instructor enthusiasm3.86
Instructor helpfulness3.38
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.92
Instructor respectfulness4.21
Instructor stimulates interest3.26
Lisa Rosenstein 15 reported responses 4.31Eval / 5
Overall4.31 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.75
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.