Course record MSE
MSE 2801
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
10 sections5 professors
Grades: 2011–2022Evaluations: 2012–2018
Flunk Score68/100
StrongMohan Srinivasarao 4 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Srinivasarao vs. the course average
A
+11.8
B
−6.2
C
−5.6
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.94 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.95
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Mary Realff 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Realff vs. the course average
A
+11.8
B
−6.2
C
−5.6
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Christine Valle 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Valle vs. the course average
A
−11.7
B
+11.8
C
−0.1
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.91 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
William Carter 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2022 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2022
Compare with the course
Carter vs. the course average
A
−18.2
B
+3.8
C
+14.4
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Jung Park 5 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.95
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.95
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.