Course record MSE
MSE 1111
Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
25 sections10 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score71/100
Strong
Meisha Shofner 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2018 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Shofner vs. the course average
A
+10.0
B
−8.7
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness4.37
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.57
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Fred Cook 2 sections · 2 terms · 2015–2016 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Cook vs. the course average
A
+8.9
B
−8.0
C
−0.4
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.77 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.25
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness2.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.15
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability3.70
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness3.85
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge2.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.20
Naresh Thadhani 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2025 3.96GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2025
Compare with the course
Thadhani vs. the course average
A
+6.8
B
−5.4
C
−0.9
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Fall 2025
Overall4.54 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.39
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.08
Instructor availability4.34
Instructor communication4.47
Instructor effectiveness4.59
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.71
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
David Bucknall 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2014 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2014
Compare with the course
Bucknall vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
−5.5
C
+0.1
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.89 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm3.65
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability3.55
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Rosario Gerhardt 7 sections · 7 terms · 2016–2022 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2016–2022
Compare with the course
Gerhardt vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+3.2
C
−0.6
D
−0.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2022
Overall3.40 / 5
24 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.89
Instructor clarity2.94
Course effectiveness2.91
Instructor enthusiasm3.64
Instructor helpfulness3.17
Instructor availability3.91
Instructor communication3.37
Instructor effectiveness3.16
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge2.74
Instructor stimulates interest3.29
Anselm Griffin 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2013 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Griffin vs. the course average
A
−12.3
B
+13.0
C
−0.2
D
−0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.44 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
William Carter 1 sections · 1 term · 2011 · Limited sample 3.61GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2011 · Limited sample
Kenneth Sandhage 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall4.75 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Alena Alamgir 22 reported responses 3.46Eval / 5
Overall3.46 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.29
Instructor enthusiasm3.54
Instructor helpfulness3.65
Instructor availability3.42
Instructor communication3.64
Instructor effectiveness3.53
Instructor respectfulness3.47
Instructor stimulates interest3.11
Satish Kumar 4 reported responses 4.59Eval / 5
Overall4.59 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.