Course record ML
ML 2500
Think Globally, Act Locally: An Introduction to Cross-Cultural Studies
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
52 sections19 professors
Grades: 2020–2025Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score70/100
Strong
Natalie Khazaal 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2022 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Khazaal vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−7.8
C
−1.3
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.72 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Marina Yancey 6 sections · 5 terms · 2023–2024 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Yancey vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−7.8
C
−1.3
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2023Fall 2024
Overall4.67 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.33
Instructor clarity4.61
Course effectiveness4.51
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.68
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Kelly Comfort 3 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2024 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Comfort vs. the course average
A
+5.5
B
−3.1
C
−1.3
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Hongchen Wu 5 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Wu vs. the course average
A
+5.8
B
−5.2
C
−1.3
D
+0.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.42
Instructor clarity4.81
Course effectiveness4.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.79
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.39
Instructor stimulates interest4.89
Amanda Weiss 7 sections · 6 terms · 2020–2025 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Weiss vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−5.3
C
−0.3
D
−0.6
F
+0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Summer 2025
Overall4.89 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.68
Instructor clarity4.86
Course effectiveness4.81
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Christophe Ippolito 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2025 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Ippolito vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
−0.9
C
+0.8
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.66 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.00
Instructor clarity2.50
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Annika Orich 4 sections · 4 terms · 2024–2025 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Orich vs. the course average
A
+1.8
B
−2.5
C
+0.2
D
+0.9
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2024Fall 2025
Overall4.58 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity4.25
Course effectiveness4.17
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.88
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Satomi Suzuki Chenoweth 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Chenoweth vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+0.7
C
+1.2
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Ren Tan 8 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2024 3.80GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Tan vs. the course average
A
−3.6
B
+2.5
C
same
D
+0.4
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Spring 2024
Overall4.47 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.06
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.29
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.61
Instructor communication4.48
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.71
Assignment measured knowledge3.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Keung Bae 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.67GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Bae vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
+16.3
C
+3.3
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.94 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
David Marcus 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2022 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Marcus vs. the course average
A
−18.2
B
+13.3
C
+1.2
D
+4.2
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.33 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Ayda Melika 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Melika vs. the course average
A
−25.9
B
+22.1
C
+4.9
D
−0.6
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Roya Mesbah 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.74 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Ankita Rathour 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Wenbo Chang 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Brigitte Stepanov 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.85 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Dina Khapaeva 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Stuart Goldberg 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Ahmed Ahmed 20 reported responses 4.86Eval / 5
Overall4.86 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.