Course record MGT
MGT 6510
Leadership Development
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
69 sections5 professors
Grades: 2016–2025Evaluations: 2016–2024
Flunk Score80/100
ExcellentKatie Badura 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Badura vs. the course average
A
+7.0
B
−6.1
C
−1.0
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.78
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Terry Blum 5 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Blum vs. the course average
A
+5.4
B
−4.4
C
−1.0
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.77 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.78
Instructor clarity3.06
Course effectiveness2.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.42
Instructor helpfulness3.66
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.16
Instructor respectfulness4.58
Assignment measured knowledge3.06
Instructor stimulates interest2.96
Dong Liu 51 sections · 14 terms · 2019–2025 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 51 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
−0.2
B
−0.1
C
+0.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.78 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.91
Instructor clarity4.57
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.71
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Anthony Daloisio 11 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2018 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Daloisio vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+3.5
C
−0.9
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.40 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.74
Instructor clarity3.19
Course effectiveness2.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.51
Instructor helpfulness2.63
Instructor availability3.99
Instructor communication2.49
Instructor effectiveness2.99
Instructor respectfulness4.31
Assignment measured knowledge2.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.09
Gregory Marr 39 reported responses 3.74Eval / 5
Overall3.74 / 5
39 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.