Course record MGT
MGT 6203
Data Analytics in Business
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
78 sections10 professors
Grades: 2016–2025Evaluations: 2016–2024
Flunk Score57/100
Mixed record
Lizhen Xu 10 sections · 7 terms · 2021–2025 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
−2.1
C
−1.2
D
−0.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2021Fall 2025
Overall4.35 / 5
50 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.65
Instructor clarity4.28
Course effectiveness4.12
Instructor enthusiasm4.62
Instructor helpfulness4.13
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.41
Instructor respectfulness4.44
Assignment measured knowledge4.01
Instructor stimulates interest3.97
Sridhar Narasimhan 20 sections · 9 terms · 2016–2021 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 20 sections · 2016–2021
Compare with the course
Narasimhan vs. the course average
A
+5.7
B
−4.8
C
−0.6
D
−0.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2021
Overall4.32 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.27
Course effectiveness4.23
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.03
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.49
Instructor effectiveness4.32
Instructor respectfulness4.49
Assignment measured knowledge4.07
Instructor stimulates interest4.13
Frederic Bien 25 sections · 12 terms · 2019–2023 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 25 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Bien vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−2.0
C
−1.1
D
−0.7
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Summer 2023
Overall3.73 / 5
104 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.53
Instructor clarity3.43
Course effectiveness3.69
Instructor enthusiasm3.93
Instructor helpfulness3.37
Instructor availability3.85
Instructor communication3.69
Instructor effectiveness3.75
Instructor respectfulness4.11
Assignment measured knowledge3.72
Instructor stimulates interest3.66
Zhaohu Fan 6 sections · 4 terms · 2023–2024 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Fan vs. the course average
A
−5.7
B
+3.8
C
+2.5
D
−1.0
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2023Fall 2024
Overall4.60 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Lei Xu 3 sections · 3 terms · 2024–2025 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A
−2.8
B
−11.9
C
+15.9
D
−1.0
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall5.00 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Yu Hu 13 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2017–2019
Compare with the course
Hu vs. the course average
A
−17.0
B
+14.6
C
−0.6
D
+3.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.51 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.49
Instructor clarity4.32
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.36
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.52
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.21
Instructor stimulates interest4.52
Beverly Wright 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.16 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Qiuping Yu 32 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
32 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.35
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Jonathan Clarke 37 reported responses 4.58Eval / 5
Overall4.58 / 5
37 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Michael Lowe 51 reported responses 4.41Eval / 5
Overall4.41 / 5
51 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.