Course record MGT
MGT 6022
Financial Reporting and Analysis II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
33 sections6 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score18/100
Needs work
Donald Young 6 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2016 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
+2.2
C
−5.0
D
−0.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2016
Overall4.66 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Ryan Blunck 12 sections · 7 terms · 2017–2021 3.54GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2017–2021
Compare with the course
Blunck vs. the course average
A
+10.9
B
−16.8
C
+7.5
D
−0.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2021
Overall4.75 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.34
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.86
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Jane Thayer 8 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2025 3.41GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Thayer vs. the course average
A
+0.7
B
−0.4
C
−3.2
D
−0.5
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2025
Overall4.92 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Eugene Comiskey 5 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Comiskey vs. the course average
A
−16.0
B
+21.4
C
−3.8
D
−0.5
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.68 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Siriyama Herath 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Michael Kilgore 1 sections · 1 term · 2014 · Limited sample 3.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2014 · Limited sample
Overall3.88 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness2.80
Instructor availability2.30
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.