Course record MGT
MGT 6000
Financial and Managerial Accounting I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
101 sections11 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score37/100
Below average
James Moon 6 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2022 3.82GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Moon vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−8.4
C
−1.4
D
−0.5
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2022
Overall4.05 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.68
Instructor clarity3.52
Course effectiveness3.92
Instructor enthusiasm4.13
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.03
Instructor effectiveness3.93
Instructor respectfulness4.62
Assignment measured knowledge3.62
Instructor stimulates interest3.58
Deborah Turner 38 sections · 23 terms · 2011–2025 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 38 sections · 2011–2025
Compare with the course
Turner vs. the course average
A
+11.0
B
−10.4
C
−1.6
D
−0.5
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2025
Overall4.86 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.81
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.81
Instructor availability4.89
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.64
Ryan Blunck 10 sections · 7 terms · 2016–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Blunck vs. the course average
A
+2.8
B
−4.0
C
+2.2
D
+0.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2025
Overall4.81 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.46
Instructor clarity4.82
Course effectiveness4.76
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Shankar Venkataraman 4 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2016 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Venkataraman vs. the course average
A
−5.0
B
+6.9
C
+0.1
D
−0.5
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Charles Mulford 14 sections · 11 terms · 2010–2019 3.56GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Mulford vs. the course average
A
−11.5
B
+12.0
C
+1.3
D
−0.4
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2019
Overall4.86 / 5
42 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.54
Instructor clarity4.89
Course effectiveness4.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.71
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.57
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Arnold Schneider 24 sections · 19 terms · 2010–2025 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 24 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Schneider vs. the course average
A
−13.1
B
+10.6
C
+1.4
D
+1.2
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Summer 2025
Overall4.19 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity4.16
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness3.98
Instructor availability4.39
Instructor communication4.49
Instructor effectiveness4.07
Instructor respectfulness4.41
Assignment measured knowledge4.19
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Jane Thayer 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.50 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Eric Condie 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.81 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Harold Covert 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.60
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Deborah Swanquist 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.88 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.