Course record MGT
MGT 4331
Consumer Behavior
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
29 sections5 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score29/100
Below averageMichael Hair 4 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2015 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2012–2015
Compare with the course
Hair vs. the course average
A
+25.0
B
−19.6
C
−4.6
D
−0.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.96 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.93
Instructor availability4.97
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Donna Kantak 9 sections · 9 terms · 2010–2020 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2010–2020
Compare with the course
Kantak vs. the course average
A
+10.0
B
−6.5
C
−3.4
D
−0.4
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Fall 2020
Overall4.66 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity4.67
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Xihao He 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2012 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
He vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−12.7
C
+0.8
D
+0.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.74 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Aditi Bajaj 2 sections · 1 term · 2014 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Bajaj vs. the course average
A
−10.8
B
+10.8
C
−2.1
D
+2.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Samuel Bond 12 sections · 11 terms · 2011–2025 3.35GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2011–2025
Compare with the course
Bond vs. the course average
A
−16.8
B
+12.3
C
+4.4
D
+0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2025
Overall4.73 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.62
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.72
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.48
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.