Course record MGT
MGT 4050
Business Analytics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
31 sections11 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score60/100
Strong
Zhaohu Fan 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Fan vs. the course average
A
+16.7
B
−13.8
C
−2.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Qixin Ye 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.99GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Ye vs. the course average
A
+15.5
B
−12.7
C
−2.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.50 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.69
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.67
Instructor helpfulness4.54
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.54
Instructor effectiveness4.61
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
Pan Li 3 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
+15.0
B
−12.1
C
−2.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.13 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity3.88
Course effectiveness3.79
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge3.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Karthik Nattamai Kannan 3 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2018 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2018
Compare with the course
Kannan vs. the course average
A
+5.1
B
−3.0
C
−1.4
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness4.33
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Elizabeth Han 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020
Compare with the course
Han vs. the course average
A
+3.7
B
−4.6
C
+1.6
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.65 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.45
Sridhar Narasimhan 9 sections · 6 terms · 2016–2024 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2016–2024
Compare with the course
Narasimhan vs. the course average
A
−0.4
B
−0.8
C
+1.2
D
+0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2024
Overall4.60 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.34
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.68
Instructor helpfulness4.56
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.59
Instructor effectiveness4.64
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Frederic Bien 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2022 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Bien vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+12.3
C
−2.2
D
−0.3
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.68 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.05
Course effectiveness3.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication3.90
Instructor effectiveness3.40
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge3.60
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Yu Hu 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2023 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2023
Compare with the course
Hu vs. the course average
A
−14.4
B
+12.0
C
+1.3
D
+1.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.65 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.71
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.76
Instructor enthusiasm4.78
Instructor helpfulness4.69
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.71
Instructor stimulates interest4.61
Yunyoung Hur 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019 3.46GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Hur vs. the course average
A
−21.8
B
+16.1
C
+2.4
D
−0.3
F
+3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.03 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity3.45
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication3.95
Instructor effectiveness3.85
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest3.45
Patricia Angle 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.78GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.