Course record MGT
MGT 4027
Financial Reporting and Analysis II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
26 sections6 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score11/100
Needs work
Jane Thayer 6 sections · 6 terms · 2020–2025 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Thayer vs. the course average
A
+20.5
B
−10.9
C
−8.1
D
−0.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2025
Overall4.81 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.67
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.76
Instructor enthusiasm4.84
Instructor helpfulness4.74
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.91
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Siriyama Herath 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2013 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2013
Compare with the course
Herath vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
+1.0
C
−1.5
D
−1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Ryan Blunck 9 sections · 9 terms · 2016–2021 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2016–2021
Compare with the course
Blunck vs. the course average
A
+7.3
B
−3.7
C
−5.0
D
+0.8
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Spring 2021
Overall4.91 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.74
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.96
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Donald Young 4 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2016 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2013–2016
Compare with the course
Young vs. the course average
A
−14.1
B
+9.0
C
+7.9
D
−1.6
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2016
Overall4.81 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.72
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
Eugene Comiskey 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Comiskey vs. the course average
A
−16.8
B
+5.5
C
+8.0
D
+1.7
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.15 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Michael Kilgore 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2015 2.73GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
Kilgore vs. the course average
A
−34.5
B
+16.4
C
+16.1
D
+0.5
F
+1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.90 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.60
Instructor availability3.60
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness3.90
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.30
Instructor stimulates interest3.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.