Course record MGT
MGT 3745
Business Programming
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
44 sections7 professors
Grades: 2016–2025Evaluations: 2016–2024
Flunk Score26/100
Below average
Chunghan Kang 4 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2024 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Kang vs. the course average
A
+2.4
B
+2.9
C
−2.9
D
−1.7
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Spring 2024
Overall4.59 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.57
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness4.82
Instructor enthusiasm4.38
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Adrian Gardiner 12 sections · 12 terms · 2019–2025 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Gardiner vs. the course average
A
+4.2
B
−1.8
C
−1.1
D
−1.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.56 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.38
Instructor clarity4.21
Course effectiveness4.41
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.73
Instructor communication4.56
Instructor effectiveness4.62
Instructor respectfulness4.81
Assignment measured knowledge4.32
Instructor stimulates interest4.24
John Mcswain 11 sections · 11 terms · 2019–2025 3.44GPA
Published grade shares · 11 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Mcswain vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
−3.1
C
+0.9
D
+3.4
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.01 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.24
Instructor clarity3.87
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.02
Instructor helpfulness4.11
Instructor availability4.11
Instructor communication4.24
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness3.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.06
Instructor stimulates interest4.06
Lizhen Xu 14 sections · 8 terms · 2016–2021 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2016–2021
Compare with the course
Xu vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+6.2
C
+2.8
D
−0.3
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Spring 2021
Overall4.60 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.45
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.74
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.54
Instructor stimulates interest4.13
Zhaohu Fan 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.91 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.56
Instructor clarity4.73
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Yoon Jin Choi 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Joycelyn Ward 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.01 / 5
33 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness3.30
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness3.70
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.