Course record ME
ME 6201
Principles of Continuum Mechanics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
52 sections9 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2013–2023
Flunk Score40/100
Mixed record
Mohammed Cherkaoui 6 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2015
Compare with the course
Cherkaoui vs. the course average
A
+27.9
B
−22.7
C
−5.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2015
Overall4.06 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm3.93
Instructor helpfulness3.37
Instructor availability3.40
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness3.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Stephane Berbenni 4 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.95GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Berbenni vs. the course average
A
+23.2
B
−17.9
C
−5.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2022Fall 2025
Overall3.51 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.49
Instructor clarity2.67
Course effectiveness3.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.75
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication3.67
Instructor effectiveness3.05
Instructor respectfulness3.92
Assignment measured knowledge3.94
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Hang Qi 5 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Qi vs. the course average
A
+12.9
B
−8.7
C
−4.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.17 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.12
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.34
Instructor helpfulness3.20
Instructor availability4.12
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.48
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.12
Min Zhou 14 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2010–2025
Compare with the course
Zhou vs. the course average
A
−2.8
B
+6.6
C
−4.0
D
same
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Overall4.30 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.23
Instructor respectfulness4.68
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.07
Etienne Patoor 6 sections · 6 terms · 2017–2021 3.66GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2017–2021
Compare with the course
Patoor vs. the course average
A
−2.9
B
+5.1
C
−2.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2021
Overall4.65 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.44
Course effectiveness4.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness4.72
Instructor availability4.86
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.78
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
David Mcdowell 9 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2021 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2011–2021
Compare with the course
Mcdowell vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+2.7
C
+2.7
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2021
Ting Zhu 4 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 3.39GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Zhu vs. the course average
A
−23.2
B
+19.1
C
+4.2
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.42 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.55
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Yuhang Hu 2 sections · 1 term · 2023 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023
Compare with the course
Hu vs. the course average
A
−23.9
B
+3.2
C
+20.7
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.09 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.67
Instructor clarity3.70
Course effectiveness3.94
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.28
Instructor effectiveness4.17
Instructor respectfulness4.69
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest3.64
Surya Kalidindi 2 sections · 1 term · 2019 2.73GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Kalidindi vs. the course average
A
−56.8
B
+19.9
C
+36.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.79 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.15
Instructor clarity3.35
Course effectiveness3.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness3.35
Instructor availability4.25
Instructor communication4.15
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.15
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.