Course record ME
ME 4042
Interactive Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
26 sections5 professors
Grades: 2019–2025Evaluations: 2020–2024
Flunk Score59/100
Mixed recordDenis Dorozhkin 6 sections · 5 terms · 2021–2025 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Dorozhkin vs. the course average
A
+9.7
B
−7.2
C
−1.7
D
−0.5
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2021Spring 2025
Overall4.67 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.39
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.54
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.55
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Yan Wang 5 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A
+7.0
B
−6.0
C
−0.8
D
+0.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.91 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness3.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Raghuram Pucha 6 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2024 3.73GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Pucha vs. the course average
A
−1.8
B
−0.8
C
+2.0
D
+0.2
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2020Summer 2024
Overall4.18 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm4.10
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication4.17
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Justin Chow 2 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2024 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2023–2024
Compare with the course
Chow vs. the course average
A
−4.4
B
+2.3
C
−0.2
D
+1.6
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.67 / 5
35 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.29
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.68
Instructor enthusiasm4.31
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.84
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest4.47
Suresh Sitaraman 7 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2025 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Sitaraman vs. the course average
A
−10.7
B
+10.5
C
+0.4
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.54 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.