Course record ME
ME 2803
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
18 sections8 professors
Grades: 2014–2025Evaluations: 2014–2024
Flunk Score76/100
StrongRudolph Gleason 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2023
Compare with the course
Gleason vs. the course average
A
+9.4
B
−8.1
C
−1.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.44 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Aldo Ferri 4 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Ferri vs. the course average
A
+3.7
B
−2.3
C
−1.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Spring 2025
Overall4.93 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.29
Instructor clarity4.94
Course effectiveness4.89
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.94
Instructor availability4.94
Instructor communication4.94
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.94
Assignment measured knowledge4.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.94
Raghupathy Sivakumar 9 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2015 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Sivakumar vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+0.8
C
+0.9
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.68 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.72
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.73
Instructor respectfulness4.62
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Louis Isaf 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Andrei Fedorov 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.31 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Kevin Hathcock 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.86 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.75
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Raymond Vito 3 reported responses 4.47Eval / 5
Overall4.47 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.32
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.22
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.32
Instructor stimulates interest4.26
Wilbur Lam 3 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.56
Instructor availability4.66
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.66
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Instructor stimulates interest4.66
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.