Course record MATH
MATH 8803
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
84 sections54 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score81/100
Excellent
Michael Lacey 3 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2024 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2014–2024
Compare with the course
Lacey vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.74 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Rafael De La Llave 2 sections · 2 terms · 2012–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012–2015
Compare with the course
Llave vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.15
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Heinrich Matzinger 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Matzinger vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Dan Margalit 5 sections · 4 terms · 2013–2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2013–2020
Compare with the course
Margalit vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2020
Overall4.92 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.67
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Christian Houdre 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Houdre vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall5.00 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Vladimir Koltchinskii 2 sections · 2 terms · 2013–2019 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013–2019
Compare with the course
Koltchinskii vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.94 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.95
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Galyna Livshyts 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018–2023
Compare with the course
Livshyts vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.50 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
John Etnyre 7 sections · 5 terms · 2018–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Etnyre vs. the course average
A
+5.3
B
−4.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2025
Overall4.90 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.95
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Jennifer Hom 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2025 3.97GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Hom vs. the course average
A
+2.3
B
−1.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.96 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.26
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Matthew Baker 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2025 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Baker vs. the course average
A
−0.3
B
+1.3
C
−0.9
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.