Course record MATH
MATH 4280
Introduction to Information Theory
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
18 sections6 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score10/100
Needs workSoon Kim 3 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 3.71GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+17.9
B
−8.4
C
−2.8
D
−0.8
F
−5.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.94 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.17
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness3.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Han Huang 4 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2022 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Huang vs. the course average
A
−2.6
B
+12.7
C
−4.5
D
+0.3
F
−5.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.93 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Jean Bellissard 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2017 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2017
Compare with the course
Bellissard vs. the course average
A
−7.5
B
+3.2
C
+2.9
D
−0.8
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2017
Overall4.46 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.72
Instructor clarity4.20
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.53
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Prasad Tetali 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2019 3.14GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2019
Compare with the course
Tetali vs. the course average
A
−8.8
B
+0.7
C
+6.3
D
+1.4
F
+0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.05 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.02
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm4.27
Instructor helpfulness3.44
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication3.72
Instructor effectiveness3.97
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.87
Zhiyu Wang 3 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2023 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Wang vs. the course average
A
+9.3
B
−20.2
C
+2.0
D
+0.4
F
+8.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.50 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.44
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness4.61
Instructor enthusiasm4.48
Instructor helpfulness4.54
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.21
Xing Yu 1 sections · 1 term · 2013 · Limited sample 2.83GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2013 · Limited sample
Overall4.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.65
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.