Course record MATH
MATH 3406
A Second Course in Linear Algebra
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
55 sections25 professors
Grades: 2016–2025Evaluations: 2016–2024
Flunk Score10/100
Needs work
Michael Loss 10 sections · 9 terms · 2017–2024 3.54GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2017–2024
Compare with the course
Loss vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−2.2
C
−3.8
D
−2.6
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2017Fall 2024
Overall4.85 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.82
Course effectiveness4.79
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.64
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Igor Belegradek 8 sections · 6 terms · 2018–2025 3.43GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2018–2025
Compare with the course
Belegradek vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
+6.4
C
−3.1
D
−2.8
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Spring 2025
Overall4.56 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.32
Instructor clarity4.28
Course effectiveness4.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.64
Instructor helpfulness4.46
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.68
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.62
Assignment measured knowledge4.44
Instructor stimulates interest4.46
Albert Fathi 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2023 3.42GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Fathi vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
−1.8
C
+2.3
D
−1.7
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.65 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.03
Instructor clarity3.07
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.60
Instructor helpfulness3.22
Instructor availability4.32
Instructor communication3.82
Instructor effectiveness3.42
Instructor respectfulness4.37
Assignment measured knowledge3.94
Instructor stimulates interest3.33
Thang Le 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 3.38GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Le vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−2.5
C
−2.0
D
+2.6
F
−2.6
Difference in percentage points.
Yao Yao 3 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2020 3.28GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Yao vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+6.3
C
+0.5
D
−0.5
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.83 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.27
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.63
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Anton Leykin 5 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2024 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2016–2024
Compare with the course
Leykin vs. the course average
A
−1.7
B
+0.9
C
−3.3
D
+2.7
F
+1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.33 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.56
Instructor clarity3.98
Course effectiveness4.51
Instructor enthusiasm4.51
Instructor helpfulness3.96
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.52
Instructor respectfulness4.61
Assignment measured knowledge4.38
Instructor stimulates interest4.18
Yi-Chang Chen 2 sections · 1 term · 2019 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
−17.6
B
+14.8
C
+7.1
D
−3.6
F
−0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.95
Instructor clarity3.60
Course effectiveness3.75
Instructor enthusiasm3.70
Instructor helpfulness3.45
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.70
Instructor effectiveness3.45
Instructor respectfulness4.05
Assignment measured knowledge4.05
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Luca Dieci 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Dieci vs. the course average
A
−8.4
B
+2.2
C
+3.5
D
+3.1
F
−0.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.34 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.15
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Wing Li 3 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2021 2.85GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2021
Compare with the course
Li vs. the course average
A
−15.4
B
−8.0
C
+17.8
D
+5.0
F
+0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.98 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.70
Instructor clarity3.67
Course effectiveness3.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness3.43
Instructor availability4.57
Instructor communication3.97
Instructor effectiveness4.03
Instructor respectfulness3.93
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.83
Howard Weiss 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2018 2.58GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Weiss vs. the course average
A
−18.0
B
−8.9
C
+10.2
D
+5.6
F
+11.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2018
Overall4.25 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.98
Instructor clarity4.08
Course effectiveness4.03
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness3.73
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.58
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.77
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.