Course record MATH
MATH 3012R
Applied Combinatorics Recitation
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
Grade distribution unavailable8 professors
Evaluations: 2023–2024
Flunk Score—
Not enough comparison dataThis course does not have a reliable within-school grade or evaluation comparison yet.
Ernest Croot 14 reported responses 3.85Eval / 5
Overall3.85 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness4.28
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness3.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Alexander Ruys De Perez 15 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.96
Instructor clarity4.52
Course effectiveness4.22
Instructor enthusiasm4.52
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.71
Instructor communication4.46
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.46
Evelyne Smith-Roberge 19 reported responses 4.53Eval / 5
Overall4.53 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.39
Instructor enthusiasm4.58
Instructor helpfulness4.37
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.66
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.22
Instructor stimulates interest4.35
Thang Le 12 reported responses 4.65Eval / 5
Overall4.65 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.66
Instructor helpfulness4.43
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge4.42
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Zach Walsh 10 reported responses 4.82Eval / 5
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.59
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.79
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.83
Assignment measured knowledge4.64
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Changxin Ding 8 reported responses 3.69Eval / 5
Overall3.69 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness3.50
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness3.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Abeer Al-Ahmadieh 13 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.49
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.56
Instructor helpfulness4.31
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Yanli Hao 9 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.