Course record MATH
MATH 2411
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
10 sections4 professors
Grades: 2011–2015Evaluations: 2012–2015
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score18/100
Needs workMohammad Ghomi 2 sections · 1 term · 2014 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Ghomi vs. the course average
A
+26.8
B
−17.2
C
−6.0
D
same
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.04 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.35
Instructor clarity3.75
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.40
Instructor availability4.05
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest3.55
Michael Lacey 4 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2015 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Lacey vs. the course average
A
+3.8
B
+5.3
C
−5.5
D
same
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.16 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity3.30
Course effectiveness3.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication3.00
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Evans Harrell 2 sections · 1 term · 2013 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2013
Compare with the course
Harrell vs. the course average
A
−14.8
B
+15.1
C
+3.3
D
same
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.20 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity3.75
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.10
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication3.35
Instructor effectiveness3.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Luz Vela-Arevalo 2 sections · 1 term · 2012 2.68GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012
Compare with the course
Vela-Arevalo vs. the course average
A
−19.7
B
−7.7
C
+13.5
D
same
F
+13.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.13 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.90
Instructor clarity3.15
Course effectiveness2.75
Instructor enthusiasm2.90
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability3.75
Instructor communication2.75
Instructor effectiveness2.65
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.00
Instructor stimulates interest2.40
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.