Course record MATH
MATH 2106
Foundations of Mathematical Proof
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
44 sections22 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score8/100
Needs work
Alex Blumenthal 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2022 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Blumenthal vs. the course average
A
+15.7
B
−2.3
C
−8.0
D
−3.2
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.73 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.55
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Michael Lacey 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2025 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2025
Compare with the course
Lacey vs. the course average
A
−1.4
B
+1.4
C
+1.1
D
+0.2
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Fall 2025
Overall4.28 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Josephine Yu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Yu vs. the course average
A
+1.5
B
−3.6
C
+1.2
D
+3.0
F
−2.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Mohammad Ghomi 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Ghomi vs. the course average
A
+0.6
B
−0.7
C
−1.2
D
+2.4
F
−1.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.13 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity4.12
Course effectiveness4.31
Instructor enthusiasm3.77
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability4.35
Instructor communication4.62
Instructor effectiveness4.58
Instructor respectfulness3.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.34
Caitlin Leverson 2 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.23GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Leverson vs. the course average
A
+4.4
B
−7.9
C
+1.2
D
+2.6
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.15 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.10
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.20
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.90
Jennifer Hom 5 sections · 5 terms · 2019–2025 3.18GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2019–2025
Compare with the course
Hom vs. the course average
A
−2.8
B
+0.1
C
+3.7
D
−0.9
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Fall 2025
Overall4.72 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.44
Instructor clarity4.76
Course effectiveness4.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.76
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.54
Chongchun Zeng 7 sections · 5 terms · 2016–2024 3.15GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2016–2024
Compare with the course
Zeng vs. the course average
A
−7.6
B
+6.1
C
+2.6
D
−0.7
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2016Fall 2024
Overall4.27 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.01
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.21
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness3.87
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.42
Assignment measured knowledge3.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Sigal Nitzan 4 sections · 4 terms · 2017–2024 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017–2024
Compare with the course
Nitzan vs. the course average
A
−11.8
B
+5.8
C
+7.4
D
−2.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Spring 2024
Overall4.14 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.49
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.47
Instructor helpfulness3.33
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.19
Instructor effectiveness4.21
Instructor respectfulness4.35
Assignment measured knowledge3.96
Instructor stimulates interest4.27
Christine Heitsch 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024–2025 2.93GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024–2025
Compare with the course
Heitsch vs. the course average
A
−6.1
B
−7.0
C
+5.2
D
+4.5
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Hannah Turner 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
36 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.