Course record MATH
MATH 1712
Survey of Calculus
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
76 sections25 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score4/100
Needs work
Bulent Tosun 3 sections · 1 term · 2011 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Tosun vs. the course average
A
+18.7
B
−0.4
C
−12.9
D
−3.8
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Abeer Al-Ahmadieh 2 sections · 1 term · 2022 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
Al-Ahmadieh vs. the course average
A
+15.5
B
−0.9
C
−7.7
D
−4.9
F
−2.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.85 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.56
Instructor clarity3.57
Course effectiveness4.07
Instructor enthusiasm3.54
Instructor helpfulness3.67
Instructor availability4.31
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness4.09
Instructor respectfulness4.20
Assignment measured knowledge3.89
Instructor stimulates interest3.27
John Dever 3 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Dever vs. the course average
A
+8.3
B
+2.7
C
−3.1
D
−4.3
F
−3.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.06 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity2.17
Course effectiveness3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.57
Instructor helpfulness3.17
Instructor availability4.07
Instructor communication3.10
Instructor effectiveness2.67
Instructor respectfulness3.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.33
Instructor stimulates interest2.13
Hao Liu 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.37GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
+8.7
B
+1.3
C
−3.4
D
−3.1
F
−3.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.08 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.59
Instructor clarity3.68
Course effectiveness3.88
Instructor enthusiasm3.88
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.10
Instructor effectiveness4.22
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.44
Instructor stimulates interest3.58
Martin Engman 3 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Engman vs. the course average
A
+11.7
B
−4.4
C
−7.0
D
−0.9
F
+0.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.70 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity1.95
Course effectiveness3.85
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness2.25
Instructor availability3.55
Instructor communication2.95
Instructor effectiveness2.25
Instructor respectfulness3.40
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest1.75
Amnon Besser 3 sections · 1 term · 2018 3.24GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Besser vs. the course average
A
+4.1
B
+2.3
C
−2.8
D
−2.2
F
−1.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.69 / 5
26 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.83
Instructor clarity2.20
Course effectiveness3.27
Instructor enthusiasm2.80
Instructor helpfulness2.57
Instructor availability3.43
Instructor communication2.60
Instructor effectiveness2.57
Instructor respectfulness3.37
Assignment measured knowledge3.77
Instructor stimulates interest1.97
Surena Hozoori 10 sections · 4 terms · 2018–2019 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2018–2019
Compare with the course
Hozoori vs. the course average
A
+6.5
B
−6.3
C
−2.4
D
+0.9
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2018Fall 2019
Overall3.76 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity3.43
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm3.57
Instructor helpfulness3.81
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness3.62
Instructor respectfulness4.12
Assignment measured knowledge4.17
Instructor stimulates interest3.12
Haiyu Zou 4 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.05GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Zou vs. the course average
A
−0.4
B
−0.6
C
−1.6
D
+2.7
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.28 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.21
Instructor helpfulness3.78
Instructor availability4.31
Instructor communication4.56
Instructor effectiveness4.57
Instructor respectfulness4.55
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest3.81
Andrew Mccullough 4 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Mccullough vs. the course average
A
−5.4
B
+0.9
C
+4.8
D
+0.2
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.96 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.27
Instructor clarity2.70
Course effectiveness3.27
Instructor enthusiasm3.77
Instructor helpfulness2.87
Instructor availability3.53
Instructor communication3.20
Instructor effectiveness2.93
Instructor respectfulness2.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.17
Instructor stimulates interest2.20
Meredith Casey 7 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2012 2.99GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Casey vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
−3.9
C
−3.2
D
+3.7
F
+2.4
Difference in percentage points.
Jiangning Chen 3 sections · 1 term · 2018 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
−7.5
B
−1.1
C
+11.7
D
−1.2
F
−1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.13 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity3.40
Course effectiveness3.87
Instructor enthusiasm4.33
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.33
Instructor effectiveness4.07
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge3.80
Instructor stimulates interest3.53
Benjamin Ide 3 sections · 1 term · 2016 2.97GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Ide vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
−5.6
C
+3.7
D
+1.7
F
+1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.28 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.25
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.58
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.20
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest3.73
Donald Sampson 2 sections · 1 term · 2014 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Sampson vs. the course average
A
−17.8
B
+15.7
C
−3.0
D
+2.8
F
+2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall2.21 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.85
Instructor clarity1.75
Course effectiveness1.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness1.75
Instructor availability2.75
Instructor communication2.50
Instructor effectiveness1.35
Instructor respectfulness2.00
Assignment measured knowledge2.35
Instructor stimulates interest1.25
Tao Yu 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.55GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.18 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm3.90
Instructor helpfulness4.05
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.10
Neha Gupta 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.40GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Christina Giannitsi 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.31 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
David Harper 1 sections · 1 term · 2020 · Limited sample 3.22GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2020 · Limited sample
Wade Bloomquist 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 3.12GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Overall4.17 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.66
Instructor clarity4.06
Course effectiveness4.06
Instructor enthusiasm4.12
Instructor helpfulness3.92
Instructor availability4.56
Instructor communication4.30
Instructor effectiveness4.34
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge3.48
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Christina Athanasouli 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 3.10GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.76 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.16
Instructor clarity4.65
Course effectiveness4.54
Instructor enthusiasm4.81
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.81
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Sarah Frederickson 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall3.89 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.75
Instructor clarity3.57
Course effectiveness4.09
Instructor enthusiasm3.87
Instructor helpfulness3.63
Instructor availability4.14
Instructor communication4.21
Instructor effectiveness4.15
Instructor respectfulness4.17
Assignment measured knowledge3.92
Instructor stimulates interest3.37
Victor Vilaca Da Rocha 1 sections · 1 term · 2022 · Limited sample 2.92GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2022 · Limited sample
Overall2.76 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.05
Instructor clarity2.65
Course effectiveness2.85
Instructor enthusiasm3.42
Instructor helpfulness2.38
Instructor availability2.63
Instructor communication2.63
Instructor effectiveness2.63
Instructor respectfulness3.10
Assignment measured knowledge2.67
Instructor stimulates interest2.67
Ishwari Kunwar 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 2.88GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.69 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Amanda Hampton 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 2.73GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Joseph Walsh 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 2.67GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.31 / 5
30 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.90
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.20
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Michael Evans 21 reported responses 3.09Eval / 5
Overall3.09 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.69
Instructor clarity3.23
Course effectiveness3.68
Instructor enthusiasm2.64
Instructor helpfulness2.94
Instructor availability3.43
Instructor communication3.62
Instructor effectiveness3.16
Instructor respectfulness3.25
Assignment measured knowledge4.08
Instructor stimulates interest2.47
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.