Course record MATH
MATH 1552
Integral Calculus
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
288 sections76 professors
Grades: 2015–2025Evaluations: 2015–2024
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work
Chenchen Mou 3 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.28GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Mou vs. the course average
A
+12.0
B
+2.0
C
−5.9
D
−4.7
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.34 / 5
23 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.03
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm3.47
Instructor helpfulness3.27
Instructor availability3.47
Instructor communication3.33
Instructor effectiveness3.27
Instructor respectfulness4.07
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest2.83
Miriam Kuzbary 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020 3.27GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020
Compare with the course
Kuzbary vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
−9.3
C
−3.4
D
−2.8
F
−3.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
22 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.92
Instructor clarity4.38
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Gary Lavigne 3 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Lavigne vs. the course average
A
+16.4
B
−4.9
C
−6.4
D
−2.9
F
−2.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.66 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.72
Course effectiveness4.32
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.68
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.78
Instructor respectfulness4.82
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest4.44
Xu-Yan Chen 3 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.25GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Chen vs. the course average
A
+11.8
B
+0.3
C
−3.7
D
−5.0
F
−3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.98 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.13
Instructor clarity3.53
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.63
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication4.13
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.57
Beibei Liu 4 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2022 3.21GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Liu vs. the course average
A
+13.3
B
−3.6
C
−4.2
D
−2.3
F
−3.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.18 / 5
27 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.98
Instructor clarity3.96
Course effectiveness4.21
Instructor enthusiasm4.28
Instructor helpfulness4.04
Instructor availability4.38
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.29
Instructor respectfulness4.57
Assignment measured knowledge4.02
Instructor stimulates interest3.72
Rui Han 8 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2020 3.16GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Han vs. the course average
A
+9.2
B
−1.1
C
−2.6
D
−2.7
F
−2.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.34 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.25
Instructor clarity4.32
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.43
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.48
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest3.85
Rainer Sinn 3 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Sinn vs. the course average
A
−0.9
B
+12.9
C
−5.4
D
−1.9
F
−4.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.39 / 5
25 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.83
Instructor clarity3.03
Course effectiveness3.63
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness3.00
Instructor availability3.90
Instructor communication3.37
Instructor effectiveness3.27
Instructor respectfulness3.90
Assignment measured knowledge3.43
Instructor stimulates interest2.83
Andre Souza 4 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.13GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Souza vs. the course average
A
+13.9
B
−8.0
C
−4.7
D
+0.4
F
−1.5
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.06 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity3.63
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.45
Instructor helpfulness3.77
Instructor availability4.42
Instructor communication4.08
Instructor effectiveness3.88
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.03
Instructor stimulates interest3.55
John Mccuan 3 sections · 1 term · 2016 3.10GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016
Compare with the course
Mccuan vs. the course average
A
+1.0
B
+4.9
C
+1.3
D
−1.4
F
−5.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.36 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.67
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness3.37
Instructor enthusiasm3.70
Instructor helpfulness3.27
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication3.23
Instructor effectiveness3.23
Instructor respectfulness3.83
Assignment measured knowledge3.43
Instructor stimulates interest2.80
Hyun Jeong Kim 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.10GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Kim vs. the course average
A
+14.7
B
−8.8
C
−5.8
D
−1.0
F
+0.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.89
Instructor communication4.64
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Instructor stimulates interest3.98
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.