Course record LMC
LMC 8801
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
12 sections8 professors
Grades: 2014–2021Evaluations: 2014–2023
Flunk Score92/100
Excellent
Jay Bolter 2 sections · 2 terms · 2017–2018 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017–2018
Compare with the course
Bolter vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
same
C
−0.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.73
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication4.37
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Robert Griffin 5 sections · 2 terms · 2020 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2020
Compare with the course
Griffin vs. the course average
A
+0.3
B
same
C
−0.3
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.96 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.95
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Michael Nitsche 3 sections · 3 terms · 2014–2016 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Nitsche vs. the course average
A
−1.0
B
same
C
+1.0
D
same
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.37
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Christopher Le Dantec 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall3.69 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication2.50
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Rachel Seiler-Smith 1 sections · 1 term · 2021 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2021 · Limited sample
Brian Magerko 9 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.57
Instructor clarity4.69
Course effectiveness4.86
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.92
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.92
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.69
Ian Bogost 8 reported responses 4.60Eval / 5
Overall4.60 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.43
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Instructor stimulates interest4.37
Janet Murray 8 reported responses 4.43Eval / 5
Overall4.43 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.33
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.43
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.53
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.