Course record LMC
LMC 2720
Principles of Visual Design
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
52 sections20 professors
Grades: 2014–2025Evaluations: 2014–2024
Flunk Score53/100
Mixed record
Milka Trajkova 2 sections · 1 term · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Trajkova vs. the course average
A
+16.7
B
−11.9
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Jay Bolter 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2024 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2024
Compare with the course
Bolter vs. the course average
A
+11.1
B
−6.3
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.70 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.68
Course effectiveness4.47
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.69
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.64
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.36
Instructor stimulates interest4.38
Mark Leibert 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2021 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2021
Compare with the course
Leibert vs. the course average
A
+9.9
B
−5.1
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2015Summer 2021
Overall3.49 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.30
Instructor clarity3.00
Course effectiveness2.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.30
Instructor helpfulness3.05
Instructor availability4.10
Instructor communication2.60
Instructor effectiveness2.85
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge2.75
Instructor stimulates interest3.40
Manoj Deshpande 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2021 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Deshpande vs. the course average
A
+9.1
B
−4.3
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.49 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.23
Instructor clarity4.17
Course effectiveness4.43
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.27
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.47
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Rachel Donley 3 sections · 3 terms · 2023–2025 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Donley vs. the course average
A
+10.1
B
−8.2
C
−0.9
D
−0.7
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.17 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.89
Instructor clarity3.91
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm3.80
Instructor helpfulness4.62
Instructor availability4.39
Instructor communication4.12
Instructor effectiveness4.32
Instructor respectfulness4.39
Assignment measured knowledge4.09
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Jean Chu 5 sections · 5 terms · 2014–2016 3.86GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2014–2016
Compare with the course
Chu vs. the course average
A
+5.6
B
−2.6
C
−1.6
D
−0.7
F
−0.8
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Fall 2016
Overall4.33 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity3.96
Course effectiveness4.42
Instructor enthusiasm4.24
Instructor helpfulness4.58
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication4.46
Instructor effectiveness4.28
Instructor respectfulness4.76
Assignment measured knowledge4.40
Instructor stimulates interest3.82
Yuchen Zhao 2 sections · 2 terms · 2024 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2024
Compare with the course
Zhao vs. the course average
A
−4.0
B
+3.2
C
+3.1
D
−0.7
F
−1.6
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.40 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Sara Milkes Espinosa 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022
Compare with the course
Espinosa vs. the course average
A
−6.1
B
+6.5
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
+2.9
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.17 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.65
Instructor enthusiasm4.05
Instructor helpfulness3.90
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.45
Assignment measured knowledge3.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Firaz Peer 7 sections · 7 terms · 2014–2018 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2014–2018
Compare with the course
Peer vs. the course average
A
−7.7
B
+5.6
C
+1.5
D
−0.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2018
Overall4.21 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.03
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.07
Instructor helpfulness4.12
Instructor availability4.18
Instructor communication4.23
Instructor effectiveness4.32
Instructor respectfulness4.62
Assignment measured knowledge4.43
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Sandjar Kozubaev 2 sections · 2 terms · 2018 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2018
Compare with the course
Kozubaev vs. the course average
A
−17.1
B
+19.4
C
−2.6
D
−0.7
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.04 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity3.90
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.70
Instructor availability4.45
Instructor communication4.15
Instructor effectiveness3.65
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Assignment measured knowledge4.35
Instructor stimulates interest3.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.