Course record LMC
LMC 2000
Introduction to Literature, Media, and Communication
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
24 sections10 professors
Grades: 2014–2025Evaluations: 2014–2024
Flunk Score17/100
Needs work
Richard Utz 4 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2023 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Utz vs. the course average
A
+29.8
B
−20.5
C
−8.4
D
+0.3
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Fall 2023
Overall4.85 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.36
Instructor clarity4.72
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.68
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.98
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.84
Thomas Crawford 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2023 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2023
Compare with the course
Crawford vs. the course average
A
+13.0
B
−8.9
C
−3.5
D
−0.4
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.30
Instructor clarity4.31
Course effectiveness4.53
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.53
Instructor communication4.20
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.61
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.48
Aaron Santesso 9 sections · 9 terms · 2016–2025 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2016–2025
Compare with the course
Santesso vs. the course average
A
−11.4
B
+15.6
C
−3.6
D
−0.1
F
−0.5
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2016Fall 2025
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.31
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.56
Instructor enthusiasm4.77
Instructor helpfulness4.41
Instructor availability4.52
Instructor communication4.40
Instructor effectiveness4.73
Instructor respectfulness4.66
Assignment measured knowledge3.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.72
Narin Hassan 3 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2024 3.30GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Hassan vs. the course average
A
−7.8
B
+6.0
C
+0.4
D
−0.4
F
+1.8
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.05
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.35
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge3.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.05
Carol Senf 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2020 3.26GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2020
Compare with the course
Senf vs. the course average
A
−1.9
B
−2.6
C
−1.1
D
+1.7
F
+4.0
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.84 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned2.90
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness2.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication3.40
Instructor effectiveness3.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge2.20
Instructor stimulates interest3.00
Kristi Mckim 1 sections · 1 term · 2025 · Limited sample 3.77GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2025 · Limited sample
Nihad Farooq 1 sections · 1 term · 2015 · Limited sample 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2015 · Limited sample
Overall4.56 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest3.60
Jill Hertel 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 2.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Lauren Klein 40 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5
40 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.10
Philip Auslander 29 reported responses 3.66Eval / 5
Overall3.66 / 5
29 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.40
Instructor helpfulness3.50
Instructor availability3.80
Instructor communication3.30
Instructor effectiveness3.60
Instructor respectfulness3.50
Instructor stimulates interest3.30
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.