Course record JAPN
JAPN 3001
Advanced Japanese I
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
48 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score44/100
Mixed record
Aki Matsushima 8 sections · 6 terms · 2011–2024 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2011–2024
Compare with the course
Matsushima vs. the course average
A
+13.7
B
−11.2
C
−2.1
D
−0.2
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2011Spring 2024
Overall4.90 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.71
Instructor clarity4.91
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.61
Instructor stimulates interest4.86
Kyoko Masuda 3 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2025 3.84GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Masuda vs. the course average
A
+14.1
B
−15.2
C
+3.2
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.89 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Aya Mcdaniel 6 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2020 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Mcdaniel vs. the course average
A
+1.4
B
+2.5
C
−1.9
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.93
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.87
Shohko Yanagisawa 2 sections · 1 term · 2017 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2017
Compare with the course
Yanagisawa vs. the course average
A
same
B
+5.3
C
−3.3
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.98 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.95
Instructor availability4.95
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.90
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Masato Kikuchi 7 sections · 6 terms · 2021–2025 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Kikuchi vs. the course average
A
+5.7
B
−3.3
C
−2.3
D
same
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2021Fall 2025
Overall4.86 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.61
Instructor clarity4.87
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.59
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Sakiko Suzuki 6 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2013 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2011–2013
Compare with the course
Suzuki vs. the course average
A
−4.3
B
+7.0
C
−0.6
D
−0.9
F
−1.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Spring 2013
Overall4.72 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.55
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.65
Rumiko Simonds 13 sections · 8 terms · 2010–2016 3.51GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2010–2016
Compare with the course
Simonds vs. the course average
A
−6.8
B
+1.2
C
+3.3
D
+1.4
F
+1.0
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2016
Overall4.85 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.59
Instructor clarity4.82
Course effectiveness4.81
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.84
Instructor stimulates interest4.76
Kimiaki Yamaguchi 3 sections · 3 terms · 2016–2018 3.36GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2016–2018
Compare with the course
Yamaguchi vs. the course average
A
−23.5
B
+21.0
C
+0.6
D
−0.9
F
+2.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.66 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.47
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.63
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.63
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Yumi Parks 12 reported responses 5.00Eval / 5
Overall5.00 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Amanda Weiss 8 reported responses 4.84Eval / 5
Overall4.84 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.