Course record JAPN
JAPN 2002
Intermediate Japanese II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
64 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score27/100
Below average
Aya Mcdaniel 3 sections · 2 terms · 2018–2020 3.90GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2018–2020
Compare with the course
Mcdaniel vs. the course average
A
+23.9
B
−14.1
C
−8.3
D
−1.0
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.76
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.74
Instructor communication4.81
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Yuko Ogawa 3 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2022 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2022
Compare with the course
Ogawa vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
−8.8
C
−8.3
D
−1.0
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.97 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.77
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.97
Instructor availability4.97
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.87
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Yumi Parks 3 sections · 2 terms · 2023–2025 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2023–2025
Compare with the course
Parks vs. the course average
A
+17.1
B
−14.6
C
−1.0
D
−1.0
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.44
Instructor clarity4.73
Course effectiveness4.79
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.61
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.29
Instructor stimulates interest4.97
Aki Matsushima 12 sections · 9 terms · 2012–2024 3.69GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2012–2024
Compare with the course
Matsushima vs. the course average
A
+11.3
B
−6.8
C
−5.1
D
−0.1
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2012Fall 2024
Overall4.89 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.94
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.87
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.89
Masato Kikuchi 16 sections · 14 terms · 2011–2023 3.60GPA
Published grade shares · 16 sections · 2011–2023
Compare with the course
Kikuchi vs. the course average
A
+3.5
B
−2.7
C
−0.2
D
−0.1
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2023
Overall4.85 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.76
Instructor clarity4.86
Course effectiveness4.75
Instructor enthusiasm4.87
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.66
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Kyoko Masuda 4 sections · 4 terms · 2011–2016 3.59GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2011–2016
Compare with the course
Masuda vs. the course average
A
−3.3
B
+10.1
C
−6.8
D
+0.5
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2011Fall 2016
Overall4.73 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.63
Course effectiveness4.77
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.73
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Satomi Suzuki Chenoweth 4 sections · 4 terms · 2015–2018 3.57GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2015–2018
Compare with the course
Chenoweth vs. the course average
A
−3.9
B
+8.4
C
−3.1
D
−1.0
F
−0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2015Spring 2018
Overall4.62 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.38
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.40
Instructor communication4.88
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Kimiaki Yamaguchi 18 sections · 10 terms · 2010–2019 3.21GPA
Published grade shares · 18 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Yamaguchi vs. the course average
A
−20.7
B
+9.8
C
+9.6
D
+0.8
F
+0.4
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2019
Overall4.79 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.79
Instructor clarity4.71
Course effectiveness4.79
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.83
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.71
Shohko Yanagisawa 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.92 / 5
8 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Amanda Weiss 16 reported responses 4.81Eval / 5
Overall4.81 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.