Course record JAPN
JAPN 1002
Elementary Japanese II
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
144 sections11 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score47/100
Mixed record
Yumi Parks 7 sections · 3 terms · 2022–2024 3.94GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Parks vs. the course average
A
+18.6
B
−15.2
C
−2.0
D
−0.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.92 / 5
20 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.69
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.99
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability4.87
Instructor communication4.93
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.97
Assignment measured knowledge4.37
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Yuko Ogawa 13 sections · 9 terms · 2019–2024 3.85GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Ogawa vs. the course average
A
+12.5
B
−10.0
C
−2.4
D
+0.1
F
−0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2019Summer 2024
Overall4.92 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.93
Instructor enthusiasm4.96
Instructor helpfulness4.91
Instructor availability4.84
Instructor communication4.94
Instructor effectiveness4.98
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.59
Instructor stimulates interest4.86
Aya Mcdaniel 42 sections · 15 terms · 2014–2022 3.74GPA
Published grade shares · 42 sections · 2014–2022
Compare with the course
Mcdaniel vs. the course average
A
+3.2
B
−2.6
C
−0.3
D
−0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2014Spring 2022
Overall4.82 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.81
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.84
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.79
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.89
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Satomi Suzuki Chenoweth 9 sections · 7 terms · 2012–2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 9 sections · 2012–2025
Compare with the course
Chenoweth vs. the course average
A
−9.4
B
+12.8
C
−2.7
D
+0.1
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2012Spring 2025
Overall4.83 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.73
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.89
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.72
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.89
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.86
Aki Matsushima 29 sections · 10 terms · 2011–2025 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 29 sections · 2011–2025
Compare with the course
Matsushima vs. the course average
A
−2.1
B
same
C
+1.3
D
+0.7
F
+0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Fall 2025
Overall4.88 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.83
Instructor clarity4.89
Course effectiveness4.89
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.85
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.92
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.84
Katsumi Suzuki 2 sections · 1 term · 2011 3.65GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Suzuki vs. the course average
A
−2.2
B
−2.4
C
+5.9
D
−0.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.84
Instructor availability4.81
Instructor communication4.86
Instructor effectiveness4.91
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Instructor stimulates interest4.87
Kimiaki Yamaguchi 6 sections · 5 terms · 2010–2019 3.64GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Yamaguchi vs. the course average
A
−11.6
B
+15.1
C
−2.3
D
−0.6
F
−0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Spring 2019
Overall4.75 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.81
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.62
Instructor communication4.74
Instructor effectiveness4.82
Instructor respectfulness4.72
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.67
Masato Kikuchi 35 sections · 26 terms · 2010–2019 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 35 sections · 2010–2019
Compare with the course
Kikuchi vs. the course average
A
−6.1
B
+4.6
C
+1.3
D
−0.1
F
+0.2
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2019
Overall4.77 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.79
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.79
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.76
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.86
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Aurora Tsai 1 sections · 1 term · 2018 · Limited sample 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2018 · Limited sample
Overall4.78 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.77
Instructor availability4.77
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Shohko Yanagisawa 9 reported responses 4.96Eval / 5
Overall4.96 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.97
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.97
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.