Course record JAPN

JAPN 1001

Elementary Japanese I

Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus

178 sections10 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score27/100
Below average

Professors 10 of 10

Aki Matsushima 34 sections · 15 terms · 2010–2025 3.74GPA
80.9% A
14.3% B
3.5% C
0.7% D
0.6% F

Published grade shares · 34 sections · 2010–2025

Compare with the course
Matsushima vs. the course average
A +12.9
B −8.9
C −2.1
D −1.5
F −0.4

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Shohko Yanagisawa 8 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2019 3.65GPA
75.4% A
19.4% B
2.3% C
1.1% D
1.8% F

Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2017–2019

Compare with the course
Yanagisawa vs. the course average
A +7.3
B −3.8
C −3.3
D −1.1
F +0.8

Difference in percentage points.

Satomi Suzuki Chenoweth 77 sections · 39 terms · 2010–2025 3.54GPA
67.3% A
23.2% B
6.0% C
3.0% D
0.6% F

Published grade shares · 77 sections · 2010–2025

Compare with the course
Chenoweth vs. the course average
A −0.8
B same
C +0.5
D +0.8
F −0.5

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Fall 2010Fall 2025
Kimiaki Yamaguchi 51 sections · 15 terms · 2011–2020 3.45GPA
60.6% A
28.9% B
6.7% C
2.1% D
1.7% F

Published grade shares · 51 sections · 2011–2020

Compare with the course
Yamaguchi vs. the course average
A −7.4
B +5.7
C +1.2
D −0.1
F +0.6

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2020
Masato Kikuchi 8 sections · 6 terms · 2010–2018 3.43GPA
60.8% A
28.9% B
5.5% C
2.7% D
2.3% F

Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2010–2018

Compare with the course
Kikuchi vs. the course average
A −7.3
B +5.7
C −0.1
D +0.4
F +1.2

Difference in percentage points.

Each term against the course average
Summer 2010Summer 2018
Ren Tan 15 reported responses 4.69Eval / 5
Overall4.69 / 5

15 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.55
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.55
Aurora Tsai 14 reported responses 4.90Eval / 5
Overall4.90 / 5

14 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.92
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Aya Mcdaniel 8 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5

8 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.78
Instructor enthusiasm4.82
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability4.64
Instructor communication4.84
Instructor effectiveness4.86
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.76
Katsumi Suzuki 17 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5

17 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.85
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.85
Instructor helpfulness4.83
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.72
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Sakiko Suzuki 19 reported responses 4.55Eval / 5
Overall4.55 / 5

19 reported responses

Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.45
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.70
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Find a course or professor

Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.