Course record ISYE
ISYE 8813
Special Topics in Operations Research
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
85 sections29 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score62/100
Strong
Eva Lee 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2013 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Tuo Zhao 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Zhao vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Alexander Shapiro 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2018 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2018
Compare with the course
Shapiro vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.05
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Renato Monteiro 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2024 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Monteiro vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Juba Ziani 3 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Ziani vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.90 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Shabbir Ahmed 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2017 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2017
Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−10.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Arkadi Nemirovski 10 sections · 9 terms · 2017–2025 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Nemirovski vs. the course average
A
+14.8
B
−12.2
C
−2.4
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2025
Overall4.85 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
Pascal Van Hentenryck 12 sections · 8 terms · 2018–2024 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Hentenryck vs. the course average
A
+8.8
B
−5.9
C
−3.1
D
+0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2024
Overall4.82 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Leon Mcginnis 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Mcginnis vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−3.5
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Siva Maguluri 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2023 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Maguluri vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.19
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.49
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.