Course record ISYE
ISYE 8813
Special Topics in Operations Research
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
85 sections29 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2013–2024
Flunk Score62/100
Strong
Eva Lee 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2013 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2013
Compare with the course
Lee vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.00 / 5
1 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.00
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.00
Instructor respectfulness4.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Tuo Zhao 2 sections · 2 terms · 2020–2021 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2020–2021
Compare with the course
Zhao vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.38 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.00
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
Alexander Shapiro 2 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2018 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014–2018
Compare with the course
Shapiro vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.39 / 5
7 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.80
Instructor clarity4.15
Course effectiveness4.25
Instructor enthusiasm4.05
Instructor helpfulness4.25
Instructor availability4.65
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.40
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.15
Renato Monteiro 3 sections · 3 terms · 2019–2024 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2024
Compare with the course
Monteiro vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.60 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.63
Instructor clarity4.33
Course effectiveness4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.33
Instructor availability4.67
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.63
Instructor respectfulness4.67
Assignment measured knowledge4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.63
Juba Ziani 3 sections · 3 terms · 2021–2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2025
Compare with the course
Ziani vs. the course average
A
+16.2
B
−12.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.90 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.75
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.88
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.95
Assignment measured knowledge4.78
Instructor stimulates interest4.95
Shabbir Ahmed 3 sections · 3 terms · 2011–2017 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2011–2017
Compare with the course
Ahmed vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−10.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.85 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.85
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm4.95
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Assignment measured knowledge4.45
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Arkadi Nemirovski 10 sections · 9 terms · 2017–2025 3.98GPA
Published grade shares · 10 sections · 2017–2025
Compare with the course
Nemirovski vs. the course average
A
+14.8
B
−12.2
C
−2.4
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2017Fall 2025
Overall4.85 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.37
Instructor clarity4.70
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.86
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.89
Instructor effectiveness4.84
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.34
Instructor stimulates interest4.74
Pascal Van Hentenryck 12 sections · 8 terms · 2018–2024 3.92GPA
Published grade shares · 12 sections · 2018–2024
Compare with the course
Hentenryck vs. the course average
A
+8.8
B
−5.9
C
−3.1
D
+0.3
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2018Fall 2024
Overall4.82 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.84
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.98
Instructor helpfulness4.53
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.62
Instructor stimulates interest4.83
Leon Mcginnis 2 sections · 2 terms · 2010–2011 3.91GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2010–2011
Compare with the course
Mcginnis vs. the course average
A
+6.9
B
−3.5
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Siva Maguluri 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2023 3.89GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2023
Compare with the course
Maguluri vs. the course average
A
+5.2
B
−1.8
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.78 / 5
19 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.19
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.49
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.57
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.77
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.79
Assignment measured knowledge4.18
Instructor stimulates interest4.73
Mathieu Dahan 3 sections · 3 terms · 2020–2024 3.83GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2020–2024
Compare with the course
Dahan vs. the course average
A
+6.2
B
−9.3
C
+3.4
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.76 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.83
Course effectiveness4.92
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.47
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.92
Assignment measured knowledge4.44
Instructor stimulates interest4.78
David Goldberg 3 sections · 3 terms · 2015–2016 3.70GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2015–2016
Compare with the course
Goldberg vs. the course average
A
−2.0
B
−0.6
C
−0.8
D
−0.1
F
+3.4
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.80 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.87
Instructor clarity4.73
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.97
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.87
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Valerie Thomas 6 sections · 6 terms · 2020–2025 3.68GPA
Published grade shares · 6 sections · 2020–2025
Compare with the course
Thomas vs. the course average
A
−14.2
B
+16.1
C
−1.6
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2020Spring 2025
Overall4.76 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.35
Instructor clarity4.34
Course effectiveness4.58
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.78
Instructor effectiveness4.76
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Assignment measured knowledge4.24
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Rachel Cummings 3 sections · 2 terms · 2019–2020 3.62GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2019–2020
Compare with the course
Cummings vs. the course average
A
−18.6
B
+19.0
C
−0.2
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.53 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.05
Instructor clarity4.30
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.35
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.45
Instructor respectfulness4.65
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Debankur Mukherjee 3 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2024 3.52GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2022–2024
Compare with the course
Mukherjee vs. the course average
A
−23.4
B
+18.5
C
+5.2
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Mohit Singh 4 sections · 3 terms · 2018–2021 3.50GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2018–2021
Compare with the course
Singh vs. the course average
A
−33.1
B
+36.5
C
−3.1
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.65 / 5
15 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.53
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness4.73
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.63
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Assignment measured knowledge4.47
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Alejandro Toriello 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2020 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2020
Compare with the course
Toriello vs. the course average
A
−22.6
B
+12.2
C
+10.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.88 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity4.93
Course effectiveness4.90
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.93
Instructor communication4.73
Instructor effectiveness4.97
Instructor respectfulness4.87
Assignment measured knowledge4.10
Instructor stimulates interest4.93
Anton Kleywegt 5 sections · 5 terms · 2013–2024 3.47GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2013–2024
Compare with the course
Kleywegt vs. the course average
A
−24.6
B
+15.4
C
+9.5
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Fall 2024
Overall4.79 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.90
Instructor clarity4.95
Course effectiveness4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.60
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.75
Instructor respectfulness4.75
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.85
Antonius Dieker 3 sections · 3 terms · 2012–2014 3.07GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2012–2014
Compare with the course
Dieker vs. the course average
A
−40.3
B
+10.2
C
+27.8
D
+2.4
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.63 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.45
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.65
Instructor helpfulness4.30
Instructor availability4.75
Instructor communication4.55
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.60
Assignment measured knowledge3.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.60
Robert Foley 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.92 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Seong-Hee Kim 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.81 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned5.00
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Xu Sun 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.90 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.20
Instructor clarity4.90
Course effectiveness4.70
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.90
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Enlu Zhou 1 sections · 1 term · 2016 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2016 · Limited sample
Overall4.89 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.60
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Weijun Xie 1 sections · 1 term · 2023 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2023 · Limited sample
Overall4.81 / 5
5 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.88
Instructor clarity4.88
Course effectiveness4.88
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.67
Instructor effectiveness4.88
Instructor respectfulness4.88
Assignment measured knowledge4.67
Instructor stimulates interest4.88
Santanu Dey 1 sections · 1 term · 2024 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2024 · Limited sample
Overall4.79 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.69
Instructor enthusiasm4.91
Instructor helpfulness4.64
Instructor availability4.69
Instructor communication4.96
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Instructor stimulates interest4.57
Craig Tovey 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.28 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.30
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.00
Instructor availability4.30
Instructor communication4.00
Instructor effectiveness4.30
Instructor respectfulness4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.30
He Wang 1 sections · 1 term · 2019 · Limited sample 3.93GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2019 · Limited sample
Overall4.94 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.40
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.90
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.30
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Huan Xu 1 sections · 1 term · 2017 · Limited sample 3.76GPA
Published grade shares · 1 section · 2017 · Limited sample
Overall4.64 / 5
17 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.40
Course effectiveness4.20
Instructor enthusiasm4.60
Instructor helpfulness4.90
Instructor availability4.80
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.60
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.20
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Chien-Fu Wu 10 reported responses 4.67Eval / 5
Overall4.67 / 5
10 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.70
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.70
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.