Course record ISYE
ISYE 6783
Statistical Techniques of Financial Data Analysis
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
29 sections6 professors
Grades: 2011–2025Evaluations: 2012–2023
Flunk Score35/100
Below averageShijie Deng 8 sections · 4 terms · 2022–2025 3.88GPA
Published grade shares · 8 sections · 2022–2025
Compare with the course
Deng vs. the course average
A
+22.6
B
−20.1
C
−2.4
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2022Summer 2025
Overall4.87 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.76
Instructor clarity4.86
Course effectiveness4.91
Instructor enthusiasm4.88
Instructor helpfulness4.76
Instructor availability4.92
Instructor communication4.82
Instructor effectiveness4.93
Instructor respectfulness4.91
Assignment measured knowledge4.97
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Jye-Chyi Lu 2 sections · 1 term · 2011 3.87GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011
Compare with the course
Lu vs. the course average
A
+19.4
B
−15.4
C
−3.8
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
David Goldsman 2 sections · 1 term · 2015 3.63GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2015
Compare with the course
Goldsman vs. the course average
A
−4.6
B
+8.6
C
−3.8
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.87 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.70
Instructor clarity5.00
Course effectiveness4.80
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.60
Instructor effectiveness4.95
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.60
Instructor stimulates interest4.90
Yajun Mei 2 sections · 1 term · 2014 3.53GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2014
Compare with the course
Mei vs. the course average
A
−8.3
B
+6.4
C
+2.1
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.47 / 5
6 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity3.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.75
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.25
Xiaoming Huo 13 sections · 9 terms · 2011–2021 3.49GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2011–2021
Compare with the course
Huo vs. the course average
A
−10.2
B
+7.0
C
+3.0
D
+0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2021
Overall3.96 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.85
Instructor clarity4.13
Course effectiveness3.86
Instructor enthusiasm3.95
Instructor helpfulness3.69
Instructor availability4.27
Instructor communication3.99
Instructor effectiveness3.96
Instructor respectfulness4.13
Assignment measured knowledge3.81
Instructor stimulates interest3.55
Marcus Spruill 2 sections · 1 term · 2012 3.31GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2012
Compare with the course
Spruill vs. the course average
A
−36.0
B
+40.1
C
−3.8
D
−0.2
F
same
Difference in percentage points.
Overall3.02 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.30
Instructor clarity3.55
Course effectiveness2.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.40
Instructor helpfulness2.70
Instructor availability2.80
Instructor communication2.80
Instructor effectiveness2.80
Instructor respectfulness3.25
Assignment measured knowledge2.95
Instructor stimulates interest2.90
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.