Course record ISYE
ISYE 3833
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
54 sections12 professors
Grades: 2014–2017Evaluations: 2014–2017
Latest dated data is over 4 years old.
Flunk Score2/100
Needs work
Natashia Boland 14 sections · 2 terms · 2016–2017 3.08GPA
Published grade shares · 14 sections · 2016–2017
Compare with the course
Boland vs. the course average
A
+8.4
B
−3.9
C
−4.5
D
+0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.43 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.52
Instructor clarity4.42
Course effectiveness4.40
Instructor enthusiasm4.69
Instructor helpfulness4.23
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.38
Instructor effectiveness4.44
Instructor respectfulness4.64
Assignment measured knowledge4.29
Instructor stimulates interest4.11
George Nemhauser 27 sections · 4 terms · 2014–2017 2.95GPA
Published grade shares · 27 sections · 2014–2017
Compare with the course
Nemhauser vs. the course average
A
−1.3
B
+3.4
C
−2.6
D
−0.3
F
+0.7
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2014Spring 2017
Overall3.63 / 5
16 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.28
Instructor clarity3.38
Course effectiveness4.02
Instructor enthusiasm4.34
Instructor helpfulness3.22
Instructor availability3.60
Instructor communication3.50
Instructor effectiveness3.52
Instructor respectfulness3.94
Assignment measured knowledge3.76
Instructor stimulates interest3.55
Santanu Dey 13 sections · 2 terms · 2014–2015 2.81GPA
Published grade shares · 13 sections · 2014–2015
Compare with the course
Dey vs. the course average
A
−6.5
B
−2.8
C
+10.1
D
+0.4
F
−1.3
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.62 / 5
21 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.59
Instructor clarity4.64
Course effectiveness4.55
Instructor enthusiasm4.86
Instructor helpfulness4.38
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.57
Instructor effectiveness4.71
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge4.28
Instructor stimulates interest4.51
Yufeng Cao 11 reported responses 3.83Eval / 5
Overall3.83 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity3.80
Instructor enthusiasm3.50
Instructor helpfulness3.85
Instructor availability4.55
Instructor communication3.45
Instructor effectiveness4.05
Instructor respectfulness3.95
Instructor stimulates interest3.50
Jonathan Lowe 14 reported responses 4.80Eval / 5
Overall4.80 / 5
14 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.85
Instructor enthusiasm4.90
Instructor helpfulness4.70
Instructor availability4.70
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.85
Instructor respectfulness4.85
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Dawn Strickland 13 reported responses 4.85Eval / 5
Overall4.85 / 5
13 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.73
Instructor availability4.83
Instructor communication4.83
Instructor effectiveness4.87
Instructor respectfulness4.93
Instructor stimulates interest4.80
Murat Yildirim 9 reported responses 4.93Eval / 5
Overall4.93 / 5
9 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.95
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness5.00
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication4.85
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Instructor stimulates interest4.75
Erin Garcia 12 reported responses 4.57Eval / 5
Overall4.57 / 5
12 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.45
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.40
Instructor availability4.85
Instructor communication4.45
Instructor effectiveness4.65
Instructor respectfulness4.80
Instructor stimulates interest4.20
Andres Iroume 18 reported responses 4.01Eval / 5
Overall4.01 / 5
18 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.60
Instructor clarity4.12
Course effectiveness3.05
Instructor enthusiasm3.76
Instructor helpfulness3.92
Instructor availability4.29
Instructor communication4.01
Instructor effectiveness4.14
Instructor respectfulness4.34
Assignment measured knowledge3.15
Instructor stimulates interest3.54
James Bailey 11 reported responses 4.78Eval / 5
Overall4.78 / 5
11 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Instructor clarity4.83
Instructor enthusiasm4.83
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.88
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.80
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Instructor stimulates interest4.70
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.