Course record INTA
INTA 8803
Special Topics
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus
387 sections75 professors
Grades: 2010–2025Evaluations: 2012–2024
Flunk Score68/100
Strong
Anjali Thomas 3 sections · 2 terms · 2021–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2021–2023
Compare with the course
Thomas vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.64 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.64
Instructor clarity4.79
Course effectiveness4.64
Instructor enthusiasm4.92
Instructor helpfulness4.42
Instructor availability4.54
Instructor communication4.44
Instructor effectiveness4.72
Instructor respectfulness4.54
Assignment measured knowledge4.58
Instructor stimulates interest4.77
Michael Salomone 3 sections · 3 terms · 2010–2012 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2010–2012
Compare with the course
Salomone vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Courtney Crooks 4 sections · 4 terms · 2020–2022 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 4 sections · 2020–2022
Compare with the course
Crooks vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2020Fall 2022
Overall4.51 / 5
4 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.80
Instructor availability4.50
Instructor communication4.80
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness4.50
Assignment measured knowledge4.50
Instructor stimulates interest4.00
Thomas Boston 7 sections · 7 terms · 2013–2018 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 7 sections · 2013–2018
Compare with the course
Boston vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Fall 2013Spring 2018
Overall4.45 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.08
Instructor clarity4.62
Course effectiveness4.35
Instructor enthusiasm4.72
Instructor helpfulness4.22
Instructor availability4.22
Instructor communication4.27
Instructor effectiveness4.53
Instructor respectfulness4.70
Assignment measured knowledge4.72
Instructor stimulates interest4.33
Jarrod Hayes 5 sections · 5 terms · 2011–2015 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 5 sections · 2011–2015
Compare with the course
Hayes vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Each term against the course average
Spring 2011Spring 2015
Overall4.60 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.43
Instructor clarity4.77
Course effectiveness4.60
Instructor enthusiasm4.93
Instructor helpfulness4.67
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication4.50
Instructor effectiveness4.77
Instructor respectfulness4.77
Assignment measured knowledge3.83
Instructor stimulates interest4.43
Tarun Chaudhary 2 sections · 2 terms · 2025 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2025
Compare with the course
Chaudhary vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Diane Alleva 3 sections · 3 terms · 2017–2022 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 3 sections · 2017–2022
Compare with the course
Alleva vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.53 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.15
Instructor clarity4.00
Course effectiveness3.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.50
Instructor helpfulness4.15
Instructor availability4.90
Instructor communication4.65
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge3.65
Instructor stimulates interest4.50
Natalia Lamberova 2 sections · 2 terms · 2021 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2021
Compare with the course
Lamberova vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.53 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.10
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.10
Instructor enthusiasm4.75
Instructor helpfulness4.75
Instructor availability4.60
Instructor communication4.25
Instructor effectiveness4.10
Instructor respectfulness4.90
Assignment measured knowledge4.25
Instructor stimulates interest4.40
Levar Smith 2 sections · 2 terms · 2022–2023 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2022–2023
Compare with the course
Smith vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.69 / 5
2 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned3.50
Instructor clarity4.50
Course effectiveness4.50
Instructor enthusiasm5.00
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability4.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness4.50
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Jaewoo Choo 2 sections · 2 terms · 2011–2012 4.00GPA
Published grade shares · 2 sections · 2011–2012
Compare with the course
Choo vs. the course average
A
+14.2
B
−13.3
C
−0.7
D
−0.1
F
−0.1
Difference in percentage points.
Overall4.89 / 5
3 reported responses
Scale 1–5
Amount learned4.80
Instructor clarity4.80
Course effectiveness5.00
Instructor enthusiasm4.80
Instructor helpfulness4.50
Instructor availability5.00
Instructor communication5.00
Instructor effectiveness5.00
Instructor respectfulness5.00
Assignment measured knowledge5.00
Instructor stimulates interest5.00
Find a course or professor
Search helper · Uses this school’s records. Try “compare ECON 101” or a professor’s name.